Teams

Robinson/Lynch/LR/Reb

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-23vs Stanley/Sisco/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesElaine Bultena / Brittany Richardson Watson vs Ann Perry / Sarah Sisco6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Carolyn Wells / Amy Rainey3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Titus / Barbara Jordan vs Allison Baker / Amy Lane6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs Bobo/ARK/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelaney Gee / Cindy Seay-Webb vs Kim Baker / Diane Bischof2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Melanie Bobo / Mary Beth Munro2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Worrell / Brittany Richardson Watson vs Margaret Hicks / Sarah Bailey6-3, 7-6
2025-09-30vs Stewart/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrittany Richardson Watson / Elaine Bultena vs Keina Jennings / Janice Corkern3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Titus / Leslie Lants vs Lori Smith / Sheri Green6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLindsey Ryan / Barbara Jordan vs Susan Gammill / CARMEN RICE2-6, 4-6
2025-09-29vs Altrui/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Worrell / Melaney Gee vs Susan Altrui / Valerie Hunt5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Anita Junior / Yun Young7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElaine Bultena / Barbara Jordan vs Muay Dillard / Wendy Hannah4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs Landis/Cisne/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Seay-Webb / Melaney Gee vs Kelly Thessing / Rachel Wayne4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Lynch / Manda Wood vs Misty Stevens / Molly Telford3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Jordan / Lindsey Ryan vs Mitsy Tharp / Kathryn McMillian4-6, 0-6
2025-09-17vs Turriff/Allmond/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Colleen Youngdahl / Tiffani Jedlicka2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Seay-Webb / Melaney Gee vs Ana Bridges / Rhonda Eichler2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElaine Bultena / Kim Worrell vs Michele Brewer / Natalie Rockefeller6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-09vs Oates/Rville/CTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrittany Richardson Watson / Elaine Bultena vs Jennifer Fielding / Erika Johnson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Titus / Leslie Lants vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky / Rebecca Kinworthy3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesManda Wood / Barbara Jordan vs Amber Talley / Caroline Howse1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-20vs Oulette/Lewis/Sherwood/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Richardson Watson / Elaine Bultena vs Carolina Siguenza / Schelle Fike6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Worrell / Kathy Robinson vs Amie Denton / Susanna Lukas6-7, 5-2
W#3 DoublesMelaney Gee / Cindy Seay-Webb vs Kelly Oulette / Jossie Smith6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Cindy Seay-Webb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Leslie Lants
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Brittany Richardson Watson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Wendy Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Laura Titus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Melaney Gee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Kim Worrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Elaine Bultena
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Lindsey Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Jordan
published 3.5
3.22
Manda Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Richardson Watson + Elaine Bultena3359% games+16.6% vs expected
Cindy Seay-Webb + Melaney Gee3648% games+1.8% vs expected
Leslie Lants + Laura Titus251655% games+0.7% vs expected
Kim Worrell + Melaney Gee5557% games−0.6% vs expected
Elaine Bultena + Manda Wood0524% games−15.6% vs expected
Barbara Jordan + Lindsey Ryan1439% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Robinson + Wendy Lynch1438% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Lants + Lindsey Ryan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Seay-Webb
11W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Leslie Lants
33W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Brittany Richardson Watson
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Wendy Lynch
20W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Laura Titus
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Melaney Gee
35W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kim Worrell
59W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Elaine Bultena
26W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Lindsey Ryan
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Jordan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Manda Wood
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Kathy Robinson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.