Teams

LTFCS VANDEVEER

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-31vs CSRC GAYDOSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Erik Hansen vs Craig Gaydos / Kenneth Ryals6-2, 7-6
2021-08-24vs MEMPK ABELLOLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Erik Hansen vs Vincent Lopez / Gregory Smith6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2021-08-17vs FLYHS GRAFLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Erik Hansen vs Jason Hansen / Anthony Park3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRoderick Coles vs Eric Howard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-10vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 10
W#1 SinglesRoderick Coles vs Hamid Mortazavi6-2, 6-1
2021-07-30vs FLYHS GRAFWon 10
W#1 DoublesErik Hansen / David Clipsham vs Greg Raymond / Bob Thompson6-2, 6-3
2021-07-27vs CSRC GAYDOSWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Derek Wheeler vs Roger Butts / Craig Gaydos7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRoderick Coles vs Nate Hopkins6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Roderick Coles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.45
David Clipsham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott VanDeVeer
published
2.88
Neal Siegel
published
Donald Katz
published
Erik Hansen
published
Greg Keirns
published
Matthew Pape
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Hansen + David Clipsham5067% games+9.0% vs expected
Roderick Coles + David Clipsham4162% gamesnot enough data
Neal Siegel + Donald Katz0538% gamesnot enough data
Scott VanDeVeer + Roderick Coles303 matchesnot enough data
Scott VanDeVeer + David Clipsham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Roderick Coles
100W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
David Clipsham
199W–91L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
Scott VanDeVeer
52W–37L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Neal Siegel
17W–36L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88
Donald Katz
2W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Erik Hansen
9W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Greg Keirns
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Pape
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.