Teams

GThayer Singles RRC

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-31vs GKelleherWon 21
L#1 SinglesMeryl Golder vs Carolyn Lee6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Emily Johnson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLori Hatlen vs Gillian Kelleher6-1, 6-0
2022-10-31vs IEMcAllisterWon 10
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Janelle Howard6-4, 6-4
2022-10-10vs GKelleherWon 20
W#1 SinglesClaire Hying vs Allison Graves6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMeryl Golder vs Emily Johnson6-2, 6-3
2022-09-26vs IEMcAllisterLost 12
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Janelle Howard3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Erin McAllister6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLori Hatlen vs ROBIN Lamb3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-09-19vs GKelleherWon 21
W#1 SinglesClaire Hying vs Erika Grenier6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMeryl Golder vs Suyeon Kim7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLori Hatlen vs Emily Johnson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-08vs GKelleherLost 01
L#3 SinglesLori Hatlen vs Gillian Kelleher3-6, 5-7
2022-08-29vs IEMcAllisterWon 10
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Janelle Howard7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2022-08-19vs IEMcAllisterWon 20
W#2 SinglesMeryl Golder vs Molly Walker6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Heather Jayson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Claire Hying
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Meryl Golder
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Elena Pinkus
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.75
Nikki DAmbrose
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Stephanie Whiting
published
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Lizzie Hanes
published
3.40
Gwynn Thayer
published 4
3.13
Judith Stewart
published
Jordan Fieldstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Pinkus + Meryl Golder8459% games+8.9% vs expected
Meryl Golder + Gwynn Thayer12652% games+3.0% vs expected
Nikki DAmbrose + Lori Hatlen4548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Hying
75W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Meryl Golder
141W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Elena Pinkus
124W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Nikki DAmbrose
311W–268L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Stephanie Whiting
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Lizzie Hanes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
4
Gwynn Thayer
135W–108L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jordan Fieldstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.