Teams

KY/PUR/Sheridan

2026 USTACOMBO 55 & OVER PURCHASE · 7.5 Women 55

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 7.5 Women 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/PUR/Sheridan000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Dana Sheridan
published 4
3.46
Donnitta Pyle
published
3.31
Jan Pigg
published
3.11
Sadie Humphreys
published
2.83
Mitzi Guhy
published
Laura Pitman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Sheridan
15W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Donnitta Pyle
11W–18L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jan Pigg
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Sadie Humphreys
3W–18L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Mitzi Guhy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
Laura Pitman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.