Teams

Thornton/40/3.5/SC

2023 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.35 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jamie McWilliams
published 3.5
3.35
Carolyn Chassee
published 3.5
3.28
Amanda Mott
published 3.5
3.26
Allyson Davis
published 3.5
Donna Mott
published 3.5
2.99
Berrill Vogt
published 3.5
2.93
Alison Beebe
published 3
2.85
Carole Dahmer
published 3.5
2.80
Debbie Morvant
published 3
Jamie Hill
published 3
Janel Gray
published
Kelly Slimming
published
Kim Osborn
published
Kimberly Darr
published
Mary Ann Bruno
published
Monique Thornton
published
Sally Dane Sperry
published
Tessy Ajubita
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe11657% gamesnot enough data
Jamie McWilliams + Amanda Mott5359% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming2346% gamesnot enough data
Tessy Ajubita + Berrill Vogt134 matchesnot enough data
Jamie McWilliams + Alison Beebe314 matchesnot enough data
Alison Beebe + Kelly Slimming314 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Chassee + Jamie McWilliams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie McWilliams
33W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Carolyn Chassee
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Amanda Mott
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Allyson Davis
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Donna Mott
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Berrill Vogt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3.5
Carole Dahmer
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Debbie Morvant
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Jamie Hill
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janel Gray
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
47W–42L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Osborn
28W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
53W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Kieffer Schwartz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ann Bruno
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monique Thornton
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Dane Sperry
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tessy Ajubita
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.