Teams

SD 3.5 WE Coronado TC/ HS/ Lesh

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-09vs SD 3.5 WE SDTRC/ DubeLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennifer Vernallis vs Donna Dube / Cheryle Pillow2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Vernallis / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Laura Edmondson / Suzanne Pham1-6, 6-7
2024-05-19vs SD LLW 3.5 WE Penn Pals @PTC/ EadeLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Michelle Gilmore vs Elizabeth McLean / Kathleen Keh1-6, 2-6
2024-05-12vs SD 3.5 WE Peninsula TC/ StewartLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaree Lesh / Yvonne Hwang vs Lisa Carey / Jennifer Alioto Oliver3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Beliz Iristay5-7, 3-2
2024-05-05vs SD 3.5 WE SDTRC/ DubeSplit 11
W#1 SinglesYvonne Bentle vs Lisa Shirley6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Neivert / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Sheryl Putnam / Maren Outwater1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-21vs SD 3.5 WE Balboa TC/ EdwardsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaree Lesh / Yvonne Hwang vs Lisa Mallory / Carol Morris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennifer Neivert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-07vs SD 3.5 WE Mtn View/ HernandezLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaree Lesh / Samantha Nelson vs TOMOKO BALKO / Irene Roberts6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Yvonne Hwang
published
3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvonne Bentle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Meagan McKissick
published
3.20
Connie Kocherga
published 3.5
3.10
Caree Lesh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
3.07
Nabeelah Khan
published
2.94
Samantha Nelson
published
2.83
Jennifer Neivert
published
2.64
Michelle Gilmore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caree Lesh + Elizabeth Dahlgren9453% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvonne Hwang
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Yvonne Bentle
80W–71L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Connie Kocherga
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Caree Lesh
29W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Nabeelah Khan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Samantha Nelson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Neivert
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Michelle Gilmore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.