Teams

DiLeo

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (East)

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-29vs RathWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Dileo / Michele Conlon vs Michelle Novak / Alisa Steele6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBethany Koch / Laura Anderson vs Tiffany Williams / Maleah Hampton6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Heffernan / Cheryl VandeVoorde vs Jennifer Kemmerer / JENNIFER HEBERT6-7, 6-7
2026-07-22vs LinkWon 30
W#1 DoublesKay Dileo / Christine Veitzer vs Elizabeth Wright / Avery Link6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBethany Koch / Christine Amelon vs Karoline Rozeboom / Lulu Rozeboom6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCheryl VandeVoorde / Nancy Patrick vs Julie Golding / Karen Thinnes6-4, 6-4
2026-07-08vs RathWon 30
W#1 DoublesKay Dileo / Sara Loetscher vs Hillary Johnson-Jahangir / Alisa Steele6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Anderson / Beth Hoden vs Jennifer Kemmerer / JENNIFER HEBERT6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAndrea Heffernan / Cheryl VandeVoorde vs Kristi Whitham / Blair Gordon6-2, 6-2
2026-07-01vs LinkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele Conlon / Sara Loetscher vs Elizabeth Wright / Avery Link6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBethany Koch / Christine Amelon vs Amy Link / Cassandra Kotek2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl VandeVoorde / Cathy Dmello vs Karen Thinnes / Cheryl Patten6-2, 6-2
2026-06-10vs LinkWon 30
W#1 DoublesKay Dileo / Michele Conlon vs Elizabeth Wright / Avery Link6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Anderson / Christine Amelon vs Amy Link / Karoline Rozeboom7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Heffernan / Cheryl VandeVoorde vs Karen Thinnes / Cait Klenk6-4, 6-2
2026-06-03vs RathWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Dileo / Michele Conlon vs Kathryn Fain / Sophia Fain6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBethany Koch / Beth Hoden vs Hillary Johnson-Jahangir / Michelle Novak6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrea Heffernan / Cathy Dmello vs JENNIFER HEBERT / Kristi Whitham6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (East)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiLeo3193770
2Croy-Goettel133919123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Kay Dileo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Sara Loetscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Bethany Koch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Christine Veitzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Christine Amelon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Beth Hoden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Andrea Heffernan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Cheryl VandeVoorde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Nancy Patrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Cathy Dmello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Michele Conlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Conlon + Kay Dileo9079% games+16.2% vs expected
Sara Loetscher + Kay Dileo14070% games+2.8% vs expected
Christine Amelon + Bethany Koch8653% games−6.6% vs expected
Andrea Heffernan + Cheryl VandeVoorde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Dileo
51W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
4.49
Sara Loetscher
37W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.33
4
Bethany Koch
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4.5
Christine Veitzer
114W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Christine Amelon
34W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Beth Hoden
6W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Heffernan
66W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Cheryl VandeVoorde
66W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Nancy Patrick
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cathy Dmello
41W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Michele Conlon
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.