Teams

40+ Sandhills

2026 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 4.0 Adult Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-16vs Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis - 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Kilpatrick / David Morse vs Michael Saheim / Todd Brandon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Williams / Berry Bullock vs Tim Boyte / Jonathan Richman3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSherwood Blackwood / Edward Lee vs Steve Dinkins / Wade Jackson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-09vs Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis - 40+Split 22
L#1 DoublesSherwood Blackwood / Jeff Kilpatrick vs Carl Berk / Steve Dinkins3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJames Marino vs Javier Burgos3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEdward Lee / David Woronoff vs Benjamin Fortich / Jonathan Richman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Morse / Brian Gibson vs Robert Johnson / Wade Jackson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-04vs Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis - 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Morse / Ryan Ciccone vs Peter Tarvis / Wade Jackson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Kilpatrick / Sherwood Blackwood vs A Keith Fox / Robert Johnson4-6, 5-7
2026-04-18vs Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis - 40+Won 31
W#1 DoublesBerry Bullock / Anthony Williams vs Tim Boyte / Javier Burgos7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJames Marino vs Steve Dinkins6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Lee / Ryan Ciccone vs Carl Berk / A Keith Fox6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrian Gibson / David Morse vs Michael Saheim / Peter Tarvis5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dinkins - Lawn and Tennis - 40+319715157
240+ Sandhills137920172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
David Morse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Berry Bullock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
David Woronoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Sherwood Blackwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Jeff Kilpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
James Marino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ryan Ciccone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Morse
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Berry Bullock
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
David Woronoff
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sherwood Blackwood
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jeff Kilpatrick
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
James Marino
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Ciccone
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.