Teams

LTFC GREEN

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-16vs KNO BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobyn Moore / Jonathan Moore vs Tyler McCluskey / Elizabeth Baesman7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Lisa Lash vs Lori Roach / Michael Prudhomme6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitchell Kaplan / Kathy Hoskins vs Jim McCluskey / Sarah Bush6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-09vs SSH REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesErin Wade / Robert Wade vs Tommy Knappich / Karie Lehigh3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Randazzo / Rebecca McIlwaine vs Anne Fanganello / Bret Schroeder6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTina Burton / Jeffrey Burton vs Lisa McGavern / Chuck McGavern6-0, 6-0
2021-05-02vs VC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMitchell Kaplan / Erin Wade vs Tamara Hertz / Karr Mccurdy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Lisa Lash vs Tom Chichester / Stephanie Chichester1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Robert Wade vs Nancy Fridstein / Richard Tallian6-2, 6-2
2021-04-25vs SSH BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Lash / Kathy Hoskins vs Alisa Sajadi / Steve Mitchell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobyn Moore / Jonathan Moore vs Camille Griffin / Dan Sorensen6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / John Randazzo vs Mary Clare Hainsworth / Mark Hildebrand3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-18vs HRCA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobyn Moore / Jonathan Moore vs Dorothy Carr / Jason Carr6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Hoskins / John Randazzo vs Karen Wendling / Brian Wendling6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTina Burton / Jeffrey Burton vs Ginger Angell / Eric Goldberg2-6, 1-6
2021-04-11vs KNO BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Randazzo / Rebecca McIlwaine vs James Robinson / Lori Roach4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Lash / Lisa Lash vs Michael Prudhomme / Linda Prudhomme7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Wade / Robert Wade vs Jim McCluskey / Sarah Bush6-4, 6-2
2021-04-04vs SSH REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Moore / Jonathan Moore vs Tommy Knappich / Danielle Butler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Wade / Mitchell Kaplan vs Anne Fanganello / Matthew Keeney6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTina Burton / Jeffrey Burton vs Marla Schroeder / Bret Schroeder6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
David Lash
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin Wade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Robyn Moore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
John Randazzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Lisa Lash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Mitchell Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Tina Burton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kathy Hoskins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Rebecca McIlwaine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Jeffrey Burton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Moore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Wade
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Lash + David Lash7064% games+16.4% vs expected
Jonathan Moore + Robyn Moore5555% games+7.7% vs expected
Tina Burton + Jeffrey Burton15859% games+1.6% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Mitchell Kaplan191156% games+1.3% vs expected
Erin Wade + Robert Wade7752% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca McIlwaine + John Randazzo4161% gamesnot enough data
Erin Wade + David Lash303 matchesnot enough data
Mitchell Kaplan + Kathy Hoskins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Lash
86W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Erin Wade
101W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Robyn Moore
58W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
John Randazzo
64W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Lisa Lash
102W–82L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Mitchell Kaplan
96W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.04
Tina Burton
98W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kathy Hoskins
44W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Rebecca McIlwaine
82W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
Jeffrey Burton
47W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Jonathan Moore
33W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Wade
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.