Teams

FYC - Williams

2025 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-28vs Timuquana - CophamLost 05
L#1 DoublesAshley Helmick / Gina Bradley vs Christina Williams / Leah Copham6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Wilder vs Sally Peebles4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Haley / Caroline Welch vs Catherine Reddick / Alexa Worsham1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPhoebe Kashmanian vs Brittany Jones6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGinger Dean / Ashli Nixon vs Sabrie Edmonston / Rebecca Sale3-6, 4-6
2025-06-21vs San Jose - ConnerLost 14
L#1 DoublesEmily Haley / Holly Williams vs Phyllis Crabtree / Cynthia Hodges2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Wilder vs Amy Malaikham3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Hentschel / Adrienne Kent vs Makenzi Conner / Jami Bueker2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAshli Nixon vs Melissa Langley1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGinger Dean / Lindsay Kent vs Kim Korn / MELINDA M STIVERS6-3, 7-5
2025-06-07vs Duval/Hansen/18&Over3.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesDevon Blumeyer / Ashley Helmick vs Anna Harper / Narong Khan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAshli Nixon vs Swetha Thiagarajan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Haley / Caroline Welch vs Joanne Esch / Denise Darracott6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCecilia House vs Desi Middleton2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMonica Hentschel / Adrienne Kent vs Susan Powell / Valencia Oglesby6-1, 6-0
2025-05-31vs Shearwater - ParasirisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGinger Dean / Karen Watson vs Olesia Antoniuk / Jennifer Burrell2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Wilder vs Natasha Bogomazova4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Helmick / Jessica Morgan Martens vs Dana Armstrong / Angela Uva6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Griffith / Emily Haley vs Deborah Davies / Daria Ovodenko6-1, 6-3
2025-05-04vs The Woods - TracyLost 05
L#1 DoublesCheryl Flanders / Gina Bradley vs Christine Creveling / Jeri Tracy3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAshli Nixon vs Amy Edwards1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDevon Blumeyer / Holly Williams vs Christina Jordan / Amy Newbern0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Wilder vs Elizabeth Mercado3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGinger Dean / Jessica Morgan Martens vs Betsy Hegan / Martha Martin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Palencia - WardLost 04
L#1 DoublesCaroline Welch / Holly Williams vs Meridith Strout / Laura Jimenez3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCecilia House vs Connie Ayer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Dean / Monica Hentschel vs Megan Ward / Maureen Martyak7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Kent / Cheryl Virta vs Sarah Denson / Sara Seifert1-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs Duval/Johnson/18&Over3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesGina Bradley / Monica Hentschel vs Aline King / Heather Weidle5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshli Nixon vs Sarah Johnson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Watson / Jessica Morgan Martens vs Barbara Gordon / Julie Russo6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLauren Griffith vs Emily Hall2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Kent / Lindsay Kent vs Holly Izard / Holly Gallo1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jessica Morgan Martens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Lauren Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Ashli Nixon
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Elizabeth Rice
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Cheryl Flanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cheryl Virta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Devon Blumeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Emily Haley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ginger Dean
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Stephanie Wilder
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.69
Ashley Helmick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Caroline Welch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Gina Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Cecilia House
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.60
Monica Hentschel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Phoebe Kashmanian
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Adrienne Kent
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lindsay Kent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Smith
published
Molly Renaud
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Flanders + Gina Bradley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Morgan Martens
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lauren Griffith
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Ashli Nixon
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Elizabeth Rice
12W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cheryl Flanders
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Virta
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Devon Blumeyer
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Emily Haley
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ginger Dean
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Wilder
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ashley Helmick
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Caroline Welch
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Gina Bradley
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Cecilia House
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Monica Hentschel
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Phoebe Kashmanian
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Adrienne Kent
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Lindsay Kent
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Smith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Renaud
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.