Teams

Elings-Spanks a Lot

Adult 18 & Over - SB Spring · SB - Women - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-02vs SBTC-Volley GirlsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Cynthia Frohling vs Julie Rosenthal / Hannah Meyer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlicia Linquiti vs Becky Cantrell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRosemary Talmadge / Paula Skokowski vs Monica Kunz / Susana Loewe4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNina Gustason / Jaclyn Park vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-26vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Kovacs / Heather Reed vs Ayesha Rooroh / Ming Yi6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRosemary Talmadge / Cynthia Frohling vs Karen Suzuki / Nina Quattrocchi2-6, 3-6
2022-06-12vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Kovacs / Heather Reed vs Monica Kunz / Susan McMillan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-05vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Cynthia Frohling vs Beth Ford / Lisa Faitell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJaclyn Park / Nina Gustason vs Ayesha Rooroh / Roxanne Clare1-6, 3-6
2022-05-22vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlicia Linquiti vs Yang Ja Ballard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Skokowski / Jeanelle Posch vs Beverly Aronson / Ayesha Rooroh2-6, 6-7
2022-05-15vs SBTC-Volley GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Reed / Kristen Kovacs vs Monica Kunz / Debra Blackwell-Schrag5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Linquiti vs Susana Loewe4-6, 0-6
2022-05-01vs SBTC-Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Frohling / Kristen Kovacs vs Daisy Carlson / Debra Blackwell-Schrag5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Carlen / Paula Skokowski vs Becky Cantrell / Teresa Selzer6-2, 6-2
2022-04-24vs SB-LLW-Unstrung-Beth FordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Kovacs / Donna Econn vs Karen Suzuki / Dyanne Wipf6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoann Hollingshead / Paula Skokowski vs Ayesha Rooroh / Yang Ja Ballard6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Gigi Hollister
published 4
3.79
Bina Ahmed
published 4
3.73
Paula Skokowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Kristen Kovacs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kelly Jensen
published
3.61
Deborah Carlen
published 4
3.60
Cynthia Frohling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Alicia Linquiti
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Rosemary Talmadge
published
3.47
Donna Econn
published 4
3.46
Heather Reed
published 4
3.46
Patricia English
published
3.36
Jeanelle Posch
published
3.35
Tina Panos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Joann Hollingshead
published
3.30
Jaclyn Park
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Nina Gustason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Kovacs + Alicia Linquiti3256% games+13.2% vs expected
Deborah Carlen + Paula Skokowski11357% games+5.3% vs expected
Patricia English + Heather Reed6549% games+3.8% vs expected
Jaclyn Park + Tina Panos312056% games+3.4% vs expected
Heather Reed + Kristen Kovacs9652% games+3.1% vs expected
Alicia Linquiti + Joann Hollingshead3742% games+2.0% vs expected
Nina Gustason + Jaclyn Park5851% games+0.9% vs expected
Kristen Kovacs + Paula Skokowski9751% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gigi Hollister
30W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Bina Ahmed
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Paula Skokowski
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kristen Kovacs
64W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Kelly Jensen
25W–36L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Deborah Carlen
24W–19L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Cynthia Frohling
63W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Alicia Linquiti
91W–67L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Rosemary Talmadge
33W–44L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Donna Econn
7W–23L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Heather Reed
69W–44L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Patricia English
28W–39L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
Jeanelle Posch
47W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Tina Panos
61W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Joann Hollingshead
12W–34L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Jaclyn Park
86W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Nina Gustason
75W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.