Teams

NWO 18&Over 4.0M Wilkins-TTC

2025 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.89 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-29vs NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs Robert Seiffert / Robert Seiffert6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJack Burke vs Kent Weaver6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / William Nicholson vs Rohin Nanavati / Michael Ferrell7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDarwin Posta / Ziad Jaara vs Rick Busselle / Jay Jones6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesZiad Jaara / D Lee Johnson vs David Taylor / Austin Kleman5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJack Burke vs Aaron Levine6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGeorge Hilfinger / Dennis Meacham vs Jeff Beeler / Jason Raike4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSean Marzano / John Cameron vs Alan Harberson / Travis Baltz6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs Steven Eilert / Ryo Kitamura4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesZiad Jaara vs Jared Freeman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Latham / William Nicholson vs Mike Lyon / Sushil Sudershan6-7, 0-4
W#2 SinglesSean Marzano vs Gordon LaPointe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Janes / George Hilfinger vs Jay Dunlavy / Jacob Smith7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-15vs NWO 18&Over 4.0M Deuce-SVCLost 23
L#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs Charles Green / Brian Espin2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJack Burke vs Jaxon Nejedlik0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Nicholson / William Latham vs Bhupesh Saini / Joshua Dotson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesZiad Jaara vs Vincent Thepsourinthone6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Polonski / Andrew Janes vs Steven Long / Iyad Haidar3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs George Michalos / Samuel Gold6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesZiad Jaara vs Jack Oswald1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Nicholson / Andrew Janes vs Kyle Haines / Douglas Shaffer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSean Marzano vs Joey Martin6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Meacham / Darwin Posta vs Stefan Faerber / Gregory Lafountain1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesWilliam Nicholson / George Hilfinger vs Steven Eilert / Tory Savage2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZiad Jaara / Sean Marzano vs James Kaczorowski / Sushil Sudershan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Cameron / Darwin Posta vs Jacob Smith / Jared Freeman6-2, 6-4
2025-06-10vs NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / George Hilfinger vs Rohin Nanavati / Aiden Bielefeld4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJack Burke vs Kent Weaver7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZiad Jaara / Andrew Janes vs Robert Seiffert / Robert Seiffert6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSean Marzano vs Michael Ferrell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Cameron / Darwin Posta vs Jay Jones / Allen Gallant6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesAndrew Masters / D Lee Johnson vs Jason Raike / Austin Kleman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJack Burke vs Andrew Yokum6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrew Janes / William Nicholson vs Jason Abodeely / Jeff Beeler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDarwin Posta vs Aaron Levine3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Latham / Ziad Jaara vs Ty Langenderfer / Benjamin McKay5-7, 3-6
2025-05-27vs NWO 18&Over 4.0M Deuce-SVCLost 23
L#1 DoublesJohn Cameron / William Latham vs Jaxon Nejedlik / Charles Green1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Polonski vs Vincent Thepsourinthone2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs Steven Long / Sam Reed6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSean Marzano vs Tim Thornton6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Nicholson / Ziad Jaara vs Bhupesh Saini / Iyad Haidar6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesD Lee Johnson / Andrew Masters vs John Oswald / Jack Oswald3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSean Marzano vs Kyle Haines1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Zurawick / William Nicholson vs George Michalos / Samuel Gold3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Janes vs Joey Martin5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDennis Meacham / George Hilfinger vs Stefan Faerber / Gregory Lafountain2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 4.0M Shaffer/Koroush-Rossford111491132430
2NWO 18&Over 4.0M Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS84273373559
3NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder -Jermain73321841384
4NWO 18&Over 4.0M Deuce-SVC75362453463
5NWO 18&Over 4.0M O’Reilly-Southview57243683586
6NWO 18&Over 4.0M Wilkins-TTC28222863475
7NWO 18&Over 4.0M Meyer-PTC012951107669

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Jack Burke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.89
Ziad Jaara
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.88
Andrew Janes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.75
Darwin Posta
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Andrew Masters
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
George Hilfinger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
William Latham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Paul Zurawick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Dennis Meacham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
D Lee Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.63
Sean Marzano
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.61
William Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.23
John Cameron
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Doug Wilkins
published
Michael Polonski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Masters + D Lee Johnson15760% games+6.3% vs expected
Dennis Meacham + William Nicholson8259% games+3.5% vs expected
D Lee Johnson + George Hilfinger13364% games+0.1% vs expected
John Cameron + Dennis Meacham4356% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Janes + Darwin Posta5160% gamesnot enough data
George Hilfinger + Dennis Meacham2444% gamesnot enough data
Paul Zurawick + William Nicholson3350% gamesnot enough data
William Latham + Dennis Meacham4168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Burke
29W–13L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Ziad Jaara
77W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Andrew Janes
133W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
3.5
Darwin Posta
20W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
4
Andrew Masters
20W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
George Hilfinger
100W–73L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
William Latham
114W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Paul Zurawick
63W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Dennis Meacham
132W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
D Lee Johnson
112W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
Sean Marzano
20W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
William Nicholson
63W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
John Cameron
135W–113L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Doug Wilkins
59W–67L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Polonski
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.