Teams

Odell Davis Combo

2026 SC Adult COMBO 40 & Over -AATL · Adult Women 40 & Over Combo 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-05vs Odell Rogerson ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesDana Davis / Reiko Kretz vs Mary Harper / Brooke Homan3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Galvan / Susan Trammell vs Kathleen Rogerson / Brooke Thomas7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Foster / Diane Harrison vs Kristen Elmshaeuser / Agnes Hobson6-0, 6-1
2026-08-29vs Odell Rogerson ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelencia Johnson / Kristen Galvan vs Angela Magnuson / Julea Hovey3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Harrison / Sharon Klein vs Chrissa Matthews / Sharon McKool4-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs Odell Rogerson ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelencia Johnson / Lori Pope vs Julea Hovey / Sharon McKool6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDana Davis / Kathy Foster vs Molly Hunt / Cathy Traver6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlyssa Degnan / Reiko Kretz vs Kathleen Rogerson / Brooke Homan6-4, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Odell Rogerson ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarlene Clark / Keisha Uhle vs Chrissa Matthews / Brooke Homan3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Pope / Nichol Gregory vs Kathleen Rogerson / Kristen Elmshaeuser7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSharon Klein / Diane Harrison vs Cathy Traver / Agnes Hobson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-08vs Odell Rogerson ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesNichol Gregory / Reiko Kretz vs Angela Magnuson / Julea Hovey6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Trammell / Kristen Galvan vs Chrissa Matthews / Brooke Thomas6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDana Davis / Diane Harrison vs Kathleen Rogerson / Sharon McKool4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-01vs Odell Rogerson ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Pope / Kathy Foster vs Julea Hovey / Brooke Homan3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Davis / Reiko Kretz vs Mary Harper / Donna Edwards3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlyssa Degnan / Sharon Klein vs Cathy Traver / Molly Hunt7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women 40 & Over Combo 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Odell Rogerson Combo21541186
2Odell Davis Combo12451188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Reiko Kretz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Kathy Foster
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Susan Trammell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Melencia Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Keisha Uhle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Carlene Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Lori Pope
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Nichol Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Diane Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Kristen Galvan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Alyssa Degnan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Meghan Timmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Galvan + Nichol Gregory5159% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Pope + Nichol Gregory8161% games+5.9% vs expected
Carlene Clark + Diane Harrison10462% games−1.9% vs expected
Lori Pope + Alyssa Degnan7751% games−2.2% vs expected
Carlene Clark + Alyssa Degnan4162% gamesnot enough data
Lori Pope + Diane Harrison4160% gamesnot enough data
Reiko Kretz + Alyssa Degnan314 matchesnot enough data
Reiko Kretz + Lori Pope123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reiko Kretz
45W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Kathy Foster
67W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Susan Trammell
105W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
Melencia Johnson
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Keisha Uhle
39W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Carlene Clark
64W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Lori Pope
91W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.50
Nichol Gregory
54W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Diane Harrison
167W–117L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kristen Galvan
60W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Alyssa Degnan
70W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Meghan Timmerman
41W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.