Teams

LGCH-Chast/Westport

2026 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Men 3.0 Monday pm

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-20vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Chast / Trey Irving vs Marc Dy / Baxter Price6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Todd Wulfhorst vs Sandy Manly / Keith MacVean2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarc Carruth / Jeff Williford vs Steve Riddle / Bill Shehane6-3, 6-3
2026-04-13vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorge Chast / Dennis Pirkl vs Marc Dy / Sandy Manly2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Williford / Scott Edgar vs Keith MacVean / Baxter Price7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Todd Wulfhorst vs Beard McAulay / Bill Shehane6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarc Carruth / Edward Fiore vs Marc Dy / Sandy Manly4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Chast / Jeff Williford vs Steve Riddle / Keith MacVean4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStuart Smith / Todd Wulfhorst vs Bill Shehane / Michael Raynor6-1, 7-5
2026-03-30vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Todd Wulfhorst vs Sandy Manly / Baxter Price1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Robinson / Trey Irving vs Beard McAulay / Keith MacVean6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Edgar / Edwin Stinson vs Marc Dy / Neil McLean0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-23vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Trey Irving vs Beard McAulay / Michael Raynor6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStuart Smith / Edwin Stinson vs Keith MacVean / Marc Dy2-6, 1-6
2026-03-20vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Stuart Smith vs Marc Dy / Sandy Manly5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Scott Edgar vs Neil McLean / Keith MacVean6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarc Carruth / Timothy Powell vs Steve Riddle / Baxter Price3-6, 2-6
2026-03-09vs LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 teamLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Chast / Edwin Stinson vs Beard McAulay / Marc Dy3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Duquemin / Todd Wulfhorst vs Bill Shehane / Sandy Manly2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott Edgar / Trey Irving vs Steve Riddle / Baxter Price6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.0 Monday pm
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSRI-Riddle/ 55+ 3.0 team4312924184
2LGCH-Chast/Westport3491229202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jeff Williford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Stuart Smith
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Trey Irving
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Dennis Pirkl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Marc Carruth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Charles Duquemin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Edward Fiore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Scott Edgar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Edwin Stinson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Todd Wulfhorst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.67
George Chast
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Timothy Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Duquemin + Edwin Stinson3542% gamesnot enough data
Charles Duquemin + George Chast5065% gamesnot enough data
Charles Duquemin + Todd Wulfhorst134 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Pirkl + George Chast134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Powell + George Chast213 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Pirkl + Edwin Stinson123 matchesnot enough data
George Chast + Edwin Stinson123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Edgar + Jeff Williford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Williford
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Stuart Smith
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Trey Irving
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Dennis Pirkl
96W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Marc Carruth
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Charles Duquemin
55W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Edward Fiore
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Scott Edgar
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Edwin Stinson
61W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Todd Wulfhorst
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
3
George Chast
68W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Timothy Powell
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.