Teams

Women's Quads

2024 · 2025 NOGTA Quads - Fall '24

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA Quads - Fall '24 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Connie Corbin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Chelsey Ogles
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Carol Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Kay Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.83
Cynthia Stanfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Liz Forberger
published
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
2.54
Vivian White
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Sherri Davis
published
2.33
Julie Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Stahl
published
Keri Dixon
published
Maggie Atkinson
published
Pushpa Bhatter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Raquel Riesco
published
Tiffany Laird
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Wendy Norfleet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Corbin + Kay Henderson5157% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Cochran-Wells + Julie Stokes1437% gamesnot enough data
Chelsey Ogles + Carol Martinez224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Martinez + Cynthia Stanfield314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Corbin
25W–15L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Chelsey Ogles
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Carol Martinez
35W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kay Henderson
31W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cynthia Stanfield
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Liz Forberger
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Vivian White
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Sherri Davis
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Julie Stokes
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.33
Jane Stahl
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Keri Dixon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Atkinson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Cochran-Wells
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pushpa Bhatter
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raquel Riesco
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Laird
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Norfleet
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.