Teams

LTFCS WALKER

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-07vs CSRC HILTONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Enterman / Stefanie McCarron vs Kristin Petty / Matthew Kiser6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPat Pottger / Sue Barone vs Jessica Hilton / Frank Coyle0-6, 1-6
2024-06-30vs LTFCS MARTINLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Bates / Pat Pottger vs Jason Bisanti / Kimberly Davis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-30vs LTFCS MARTINWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Enterman / Stefanie McCarron vs Rebecca Martin / Jason Bisanti6-4, 7-6
2024-06-16vs CSRC HILTONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStefanie McCarron / Chris Enterman vs Heather Green / Adam Heitke6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShawna Walker / Pat Pottger vs Karen Ross / Harold Woods4-6, 0-6
2024-06-09vs LTFCS MARTINSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChris Enterman / Stefanie McCarron vs Jason Bisanti / Kimberly Davis4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesShawna Walker / Pat Pottger vs Karen Jensen / Ben Lowe6-3, 6-0
2024-05-26vs CSRC HILTONLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Bates / Pat Pottger vs Harold Woods / Heather Green6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Lori Kiser
published 5
4.49
Chris Enterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Sue Barone
published
4.23
Pat Pottger
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.23
Shawna Walker
published
4.17
Mike Peterson
published
3.88
Craig Rogers
published 4
3.73
Stefanie McCarron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawna Walker + Chris Enterman10166% games+10.5% vs expected
Sue Barone + Pat Pottger4349% games−7.2% vs expected
Lori Kiser + Chris Enterman4451% gamesnot enough data
Shawna Walker + Pat Pottger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Lori Kiser
30W–23L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Chris Enterman
89W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
4.49
Sue Barone
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Pat Pottger
56W–60L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Shawna Walker
35W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Mike Peterson
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4
Craig Rogers
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.88
Stefanie McCarron
33W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.