CVTA ORANGE
2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Flight standings60 teams · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1WP-C YELLOW | 7 | 0 | 24 | 260 |
| 2SS-D RED | 6 | 1 | 21 | 278 |
| 3ATC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 25 | 243 |
| 4LEBTC PINK | 6 | 1 | 25 | 255 |
| 5SS-LT GOLD | 6 | 1 | 26 | 265 |
| 6BCC YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 26 | 265 |
| 7CPV RED | 6 | 1 | 29 | 278 |
| 8WP BLUE | 6 | 1 | 30 | 279 |
| 9RHCC YELLOW | 5 | 1 | 18 | 201 |
| 10LTC-M ORANGE | 5 | 1 | 27 | 235 |
| 11VC PINK | 5 | 2 | 25 | 251 |
| 12KC-RH ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 28 | 255 |
| 13BM BLUE | 5 | 2 | 30 | 261 |
| 14LTFC ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 31 | 268 |
| 15HV SILVER | 5 | 2 | 32 | 283 |
| 16DTP PINK | 5 | 2 | 33 | 311 |
| 17SS-LGT YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 34 | 310 |
| 18CM ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 37 | 307 |
| 19BRMST RED | 4 | 2 | 30 | 229 |
| 20MC NAVY | 4 | 2 | 30 | 251 |
| 21RHCC ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 32 | 252 |
| 22TTA PINK | 4 | 3 | 35 | 302 |
| 23KNO RED | 4 | 3 | 35 | 282 |
| 24CHCC GOLD | 4 | 3 | 37 | 311 |
| 25SKY GREY | 4 | 3 | 37 | 313 |
| 26EM YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 38 | 308 |
| 27SKY YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 40 | 306 |
| 28GAC PURPLE | 4 | 3 | 40 | 306 |
| 29SS-LT RED | 4 | 3 | 41 | 333 |
| 30BCC GOLD | 4 | 3 | 41 | 315 |
| 31SS-HP BLUE | 4 | 3 | 41 | 328 |
| 32WC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 46 | 360 |
| 33FOX NAVY | 3 | 4 | 33 | 291 |
| 34PCC SILVER | 3 | 4 | 40 | 312 |
| 35WC RED | 3 | 4 | 41 | 300 |
| 36CACM BLUE | 3 | 4 | 48 | 352 |
| 37GR SILVER | 3 | 4 | 48 | 318 |
| 38CM TEAL | 3 | 4 | 52 | 337 |
| 39NJ ORANGE | 2 | 4 | 31 | 261 |
| 40MVCC PURPLE | 2 | 4 | 36 | 279 |
| 41CVTA NAVY | 2 | 4 | 45 | 320 |
| 42KC-CC PINK | 2 | 5 | 42 | 314 |
| 43WP-O RED | 2 | 5 | 43 | 314 |
| 44DTP NAVY | 2 | 5 | 44 | 334 |
| 45RMTC BLACK | 2 | 5 | 44 | 328 |
| 46CVTA ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 48 | 348 |
| 47SS-LT TEAL | 2 | 5 | 48 | 339 |
| 48PCC GOLD | 2 | 5 | 49 | 358 |
| 49BCST NAVY | 1 | 6 | 49 | 343 |
| 50SS-H RED | 1 | 6 | 50 | 347 |
| 51LEBTC GOLD | 1 | 6 | 50 | 334 |
| 52GPTC RED | 1 | 6 | 51 | 331 |
| 53KC-RH GREEN | 1 | 6 | 52 | 356 |
| 54SH GOLD | 1 | 6 | 53 | 372 |
| 55CVTA BLACK | 1 | 6 | 53 | 374 |
| 56SS-H GREY | 1 | 6 | 53 | 369 |
| 57SS-D BLUE | 1 | 6 | 61 | 389 |
| 58BCC ORANGE | 0 | 6 | 49 | 322 |
| 59DCHS YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 53 | 361 |
| 60LAC BLUE | 0 | 7 | 58 | 378 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Richard Beard + Norwood Keel | 0–5 | 20% games | −13.0% vs expected |
| Richard Beard + Yashdeep Padey | 0–4 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Norwood Keel + John Aronson | 0–4 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Richard Beard + Marc Hafner | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Marc Hafner + John Aronson | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.