Teams

KC-RH PURPLE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs CK REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKirk Turner / Thomas Lich vs Jason Massicotte / Aaron Merritt1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPat Corbitt / Duncan Browne vs Timothy Parker / Jay Wren7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-29vs GR ORANGELost 02
L#1 SinglesJim Conzelman vs Gabe McFarland1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDuncan Browne / Pat Corbitt vs Rick Koontz / Doug Killeen4-6, 3-6
2023-08-22vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeath Lynch / Thomas Lich vs David Cole / Trent Sears6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDuncan Browne / Kele Evans vs Herbert Dehaas / Hugh Harvey6-3, 6-2
2023-08-20vs KC-CC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKirk Turner / Thomas Lich vs Gary Smith / Robert Garrison6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJim Conzelman vs Nick Staehler7-5, 6-3
2023-08-15vs PH BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesKirk Turner / Duncan Browne vs John Edwards / Jason Utsler6-2, 6-0
2023-08-08vs CCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJim Clarke / Thomas Lich vs Walker Hamilton / RC Myles3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKele Evans / Jim Conzelman vs Jon Piper / Michael Heller6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jim Clarke
published
3.40
Jim Conzelman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Duncan Browne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kirk Turner
published
3.24
John McGowan
published
3.10
Thomas Lich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Heath Lynch
published
Kele Evans
published
Pat Corbitt
published
Wes Erickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirk Turner + Thomas Lich4945% games−4.6% vs expected
Jim Conzelman + Thomas Lich224 matchesnot enough data
Duncan Browne + Jim Clarke213 matchesnot enough data
John McGowan + Jim Clarke303 matchesnot enough data
John McGowan + Kirk Turner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Clarke
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Jim Conzelman
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Duncan Browne
104W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kirk Turner
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
John McGowan
24W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Thomas Lich
61W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Heath Lynch
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kele Evans
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Corbitt
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wes Erickson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.