Teams

Price - Mixed 40+ 4.0 - Mon..

2024 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 4.0 Mixed Dbls Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-15vs Bryce - Mixed 40+ 4.0 - MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesAravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Sherrie Kruse vs Brenda Willis / Christopher Bryce3-6, 4-6
2024-07-01vs Davis - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherrie Kruse / James Clodfelter vs Cari Powell / Bryan Jones3-6, 3-6
2024-06-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Martin Mailloux vs Pamela Smith / John Kim1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-10vs DEAN - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Clodfelter / Sherrie Kruse vs John Rodenbough / Deborah Register0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Dbls Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Brad Green
published 4
3.80
Chris Reilly
published 4
3.67
Ted Irvin
published
3.64
Jennifer Mays
published
3.52
Mary Beth Hartman
published
3.50
Martin Mailloux
published
3.43
Jocelyn Moye
published
3.41
Chris Amos
published 4
3.29
Leah Price
published
Janel Green
published
Joann Hartzell
published
Sherrie Kruse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Irvin + Jennifer Mays6349% games+4.1% vs expected
Brad Green + Janel Green9459% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Mays + Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Green
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Chris Reilly
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
87W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.67
Ted Irvin
26W–25L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Mary Beth Hartman
91W–66L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Martin Mailloux
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jocelyn Moye
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Chris Amos
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Leah Price
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.29
Janel Green
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joann Hartzell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.