Teams

CArevalo (Park Road)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-09vs SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Carla Sweeney vs Erin Roach / Vicki King6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Harling / Kate MacRone vs Jennifer Little / Kelly Sylvester0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZahide Marenic / Lisa Morgan vs SJ Pragasam / Kate Loor5-7, 2-6
2026-09-07vs SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Arevalo / Kim Gissy vs Sarah Harris / Maddy Middleton6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Morgan / Peggy Reimann vs Kendall Smith / Alyssa Collado6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Carla Sweeney vs Jeanette Pellot / Caroline Heller6-1, 6-4
2026-09-02vs JMugnano (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Eisenbaum / Peggy Reimann vs Rebecca Dayton / Paige MacEra6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Gladys Shinmoto vs Erika Myers / Ashley Duncan6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJJ Zhu / Jessica Salzman vs Jen Mugnano / Nicole Nelson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-19vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Elaine Eisenbaum vs Kathy Harborne / Sheila Passenant4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Salzman / Jennifer Harling vs Stacey Whitney / Sarah Garner1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Arevalo / Kim Gissy vs Tyler Brody / Cindy Rhoten1-6, 0-6
2026-08-12vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Lucas / Lisa Morgan vs Cynthia Hoover / Heather Carter0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesConnie Arevalo / Zahide Marenic vs Ashley Dutton / Mandy Occhipinti6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Carla Sweeney vs Lauren Earley / Karie Greathouse2-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs EAnderson (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Gissy / Pauline Styers vs Lori DiFazio / Emilia Anderson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZahide Marenic / Peggy Reimann vs Rachel Miller / Madelynn Bates3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Harling / Gladys Shinmoto vs Katie White / RACHEL Patterson6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)3090149
2MWalters (Carmel)3081453
3MWolf/JShelley (WSRC)3072559
4VShannon (Raintree)3081558
5RJoplin (Queens)3063770
6JWaleski (OPRC)2051227
7AMcGarry/AIngalls (CSRC)2051345
8LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)2042446
9TRicks (Queens)2042552
10LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC)2172667
11MMetzl (Sardis)2163761
12JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades)21541086
13AChristie/ASmith (PPRSC)21541074
14MLong/SFarley (Queens)1142548
15AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC)1142657
16HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)1133655
17RVora/SMoon (Lifetime)1133752
18DCazorla (BCC)1254980
19SLind (Bridgehampton)1254968
20ELeMaitre (Park Road)12541083
21SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)12541084
22MAllen/SStork (Sardis)12451195
23SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)12361387
24MLGarrison (Sardis)12361394
25CKing (Life Time)12271498
26PSweeney (FCC)122715101
27APessina/LAbhoulson (Queens)0224850
28SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)0224868
29BBaker (Queens)0224855
30CArevalo (Park Road)0224963
31CTharp (Queens)02151061
32JHargis (Pine Lake)02151069
33JMugnano (Queens)02061271
34LCulp (Park Road)03181694
35KWagner (Jeff Adams)030918105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Connie Arevalo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.12
Peggy Reimann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
3.03
Jennifer Harling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Gladys Shinmoto
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.00
Zahide Marenic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Pauline Styers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Kim Gissy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Elaine Eisenbaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Kathy Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Carla Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Jessica Salzman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
JJ Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Arevalo + Zahide Marenic8071% games+14.2% vs expected
Peggy Reimann + Kathy Lucas3554% games+13.1% vs expected
Peggy Reimann + Connie Arevalo7260% games+8.2% vs expected
Kim Gissy + Kimberley Pennington10164% games+7.4% vs expected
Kate MacRone + Connie Arevalo5259% games+6.3% vs expected
Connie Arevalo + Carla Sweeney9165% games+4.1% vs expected
Kim Gissy + Connie Arevalo9260% games+3.2% vs expected
JJ Zhu + Zahide Marenic2446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Arevalo
89W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.18
3
Peggy Reimann
104W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.12
Kimberley Pennington
31W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3.5
Jennifer Harling
20W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Gladys Shinmoto
100W–119L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Zahide Marenic
57W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Pauline Styers
71W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Kim Gissy
99W–80L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Elaine Eisenbaum
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Kathy Lucas
24W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Carla Sweeney
37W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jessica Salzman
17W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
JJ Zhu
29W–67L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.