← Teams

LRC Huffman

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Michael Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results9 ties
2019-09-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichael Huffman / Al Boling vs Vincent La Cava / Vaho Rebassoo6-3, 6-1
2019-09-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichael Huffman / Al Boling vs John Popplewell / Tim Leatherman6-1, 6-4
2019-06-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKurt Bethman / Michael Huffman vs Michael Rollyson / Steve Coplin6-1, 6-0
2019-06-27Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPeter Lusk / Michael Huffman vs David Kabaker / Stuart Allen6-3, 6-3
2019-04-28Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMichael Huffman / Terry Wise vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-04-27Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPeter Lusk / Michael Huffman vs Darrel Leimback / Jody Rush6-4, 6-1
2019-03-30Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesMichael Huffman / Joel Peyton vs Drake Nicholson / Gerald Nelson7-5, 6-4
2019-02-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJoel Peyton / Michael Huffman vs Gerald Nelson / Gregg Bennett6-2, 7-5
2019-01-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMichael Huffman / Scott Charlston vs Jody Rush / Adam Bottorff6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michael Huffman
31W–19L career
0%99%1%
3.80

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.