← Teams

THPRD-Feng 8.0

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.9 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kim Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Lori Bernhardt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Damon Ogden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Steve Sun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Ajai Singh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.25
Jing Feng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2023-05-13Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesBill Henderson / Jing Feng vs Babette Zielinski / Bill Rhoades3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Linda Lovett vs John van Leeuwen / Nancy Garlock6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Ajai Singh vs Angie Lee / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Robert Truong vs Flor Harrigan / Ahmad Garakani7-6, 6-2
2023-04-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Sun / Julie Hansen vs Patrick Trank / Lynne Gaerisch7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid White / Jing Feng vs William Anderson / Nancy Korenek-Leveque7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDamon Ogden / Linda Lovett vs Lisa Gray / Joseph Collins6-4, 7-6
2023-04-28Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesJing Feng / Todd DeNeffe vs Peter Monsantofils / Karen McNairy6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteve Sun / Kim Stevens vs Jeffrey Gates / Bonnie Sidoff6-2, 6-3
2023-04-16Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDavid White / Lori Bernhardt vs John Varner / Tina Clancy3-3
L#3 DoublesDamon Ogden / Julie Hansen vs Hisayoshi Watanabe / Carol Chiu6-3, 7-6
2023-04-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDamon Ogden / Lori Bernhardt vs Bruce Yang / Tami Oglesby6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid White / Jing Feng vs Ken Nichols / Crystal Bryant3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Truong / Rie Sasakawa vs Dave Vinik / Lori D'Antonio6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDavid White / Lori Bernhardt vs Joselito Navales / Nenette Olson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAjai Singh / Rie Sasakawa vs Kevin Muck / Kelly Asbridge6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Sun / Julie Hansen vs Ben Yamaguchi / Yumiko Pike7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJulie Hansen / Edmund Yuan vs Ian Fudalla / June Fernandez6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBill Henderson / Kim Stevens vs Chiho Cronk / Bill Lowblad6-3, 6-4
2023-03-31Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBill Henderson / Linda Lovett vs Craig Mills / Tara Guimont6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Sun / Julie Hansen vs Jonathan Quon / Kris Kelly-Koster7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Kim Stevens vs Lee Wiegand / Patricia Sturr6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Lori Bernhardt
28W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Damon Ogden
87W–84L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Steve Sun
51W–78L career
7%93%0%
3.63
4
Ajai Singh
61W–53L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36
3.5
Jing Feng
113W–80L career
1%99%0%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.