Teams

SAATL Kings

2026 Tri-Level League · Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs SA Young BoysLost 03
L#1 DoublesKrishnan Gopalan / Caleb Pallapati vs Kishan Chand / Mahesh Kumar4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBHARATH BABU SUNKARA / Sandeep Bodas vs Tan Nguyen / Muhammad Amin Ullah6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesParthasarathy Mookkan / Mallesh Pailee vs Joshua Huerta / Abhijit Sunnapwar1-6, 3-6
2025-10-05vs Gangsta's of LoveWon 21
L#1 DoublesSumankumar Allimuthu / Pattabiraman Venkatesan vs Carl Bain / Miles Hutchinson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVamshi Kaluvala / Nitin Sharma vs Matthew Sanchez / Eric Hoffpauir6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMallesh Pailee / Anandamoorthy Asokan vs Nils Frenkel / Javi Fuentes6-3, 6-4
2025-10-04vs Are You SureLost 03
L#1 DoublesBHARATH BABU SUNKARA / Pavan Manchiganta vs Juan Arriaga / Bryan Tran3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandeep Bodas / Amit Chandak vs Jose Arriaga / Esteban Casas4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRajarajan Balasubramanian / Yogesh Kannan Subramanian vs Gabriel Gonzales / Fred Shumate1-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs BBSWon 21
W#1 DoublesMuralikumar Gurunathan / Pattabiraman Venkatesan vs Luis Jaimes / Oscar Espinosa6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKiran Kumar Dagara / BHARATH BABU SUNKARA vs ALEJANDRO TOLENTINO / Daniel Estrella7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRajarajan Balasubramanian / Parthasarathy Mookkan vs Reynaldo Ruiz / Mason Spencer2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Pattabiraman Venkatesan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Krishnan Gopalan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Sumankumar Allimuthu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
BHARATH BABU SUNKARA
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Muralikumar Gurunathan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Amit Chandak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Pavan Manchiganta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Caleb Pallapati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
3.40
Anandamoorthy Asokan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.39
Kiran Kumar Dagara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Sandeep Bodas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Mallesh Pailee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Rajarajan Balasubramanian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Parthasarathy Mookkan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vamshi Kaluvala
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yogesh Kannan Subramanian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattabiraman Venkatesan + Muralikumar Gurunathan6944% games−4.4% vs expected
BHARATH BABU SUNKARA + Krishnan Gopalan5647% games−6.4% vs expected
Pavan Manchiganta + Sumankumar Allimuthu2444% games−8.9% vs expected
Pattabiraman Venkatesan + Sumankumar Allimuthu3254% gamesnot enough data
Rajarajan Balasubramanian + Anandamoorthy Asokan2352% gamesnot enough data
Caleb Pallapati + Krishnan Gopalan044 matchesnot enough data
Pavan Manchiganta + BHARATH BABU SUNKARA044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pattabiraman Venkatesan
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Krishnan Gopalan
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Sumankumar Allimuthu
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
BHARATH BABU SUNKARA
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Muralikumar Gurunathan
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Amit Chandak
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.60
Pavan Manchiganta
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
3.5
Caleb Pallapati
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
4
Chandrashekar Vemula
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3
Anandamoorthy Asokan
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Kiran Kumar Dagara
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Sandeep Bodas
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Mallesh Pailee
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Rajarajan Balasubramanian
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Parthasarathy Mookkan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vamshi Kaluvala
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yogesh Kannan Subramanian
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.