← Teams

VTC-Ash

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Wendi Ouellette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Julia Henry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.08
Ericka Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Ellett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results11 ties
2021-07-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Carol Glenn vs Nicole Norby / Lisa King6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Ericka Nelson vs Minhhang Tran / Penny Luong6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Henry / Nicola Ash vs Vanessa Gallant / Shuping Li6-2, 6-0
2021-07-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Molly Hemsley vs Lupine Swanson / Jing Li6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEricka Nelson / Rebecca Pool vs Dipali Dixit / Jane King Ayers6-1, 7-6
2021-07-17Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJulia Henry / Molly Hemsley vs Stephany Mo / Rosie Francis7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEricka Nelson / Rebecca Pool vs Caryn Cohen / Sheila Schmidt6-3, 6-3
2021-07-17Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Karin Owens vs Penny Jay / Teppei Karasawa6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen vs Elaine Hoy / Lynn Siebert7-5, 6-1
2021-07-16Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Douglas Henie / Conita Mullett4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Karin Owens vs Tom Wolforth / Song Bliss6-2, 6-2
2021-07-16Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Pamela Kohler / George Gonzalez6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen vs Chino Mclaughlin / Aaron Benson6-4, 6-2
2021-07-11Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesNicola Ash vs Katie Jurgenson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Glenn / Wendi Ouellette vs Madeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Paulsen / JULIE GIBSON vs Megan Heyworth / Julie Motschenbacher6-2, 6-3
2021-07-10Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJane Paulsen / Julia Henry vs Jeannette Martinez / Lisa McConachie2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-12Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesEricka Nelson vs Jennifer Pultz6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Carol Glenn vs Katherine Fisher / Luz Zanavich6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNicola Ash / Michelle Ellett vs Kathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi7-6, 7-5
2021-05-15Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Suresh Chand / Erin Doucet6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Julia Henry vs Martin von Haartman / Susan Rolfe6-2, 6-2
2021-03-07Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen vs Alana Rhea / Jean Pierre Belmar6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Damir Lemes / Julie Gorretta6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Wendi Ouellette
177W–50L career
19%81%0%
3.55
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3.5
Ericka Nelson
43W–59L career
17%83%0%
3.08
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74
3
Michelle Ellett
41W–39L career
21%79%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.