Teams

Dynamic Duo

2025 COMBO · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs RagnarokWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhonda Stacy / Paula Decas vs Ingrid Heinze / Sanya RIVERA6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmi McNair / Trisha Walker vs Monica Salazar / Natasha Patrick6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPingui Tavera / Veronica Flores vs Sharon Nichols / Ines Iglesias7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Strung for FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Rogers Fitch / Miranda Richard vs Brigette Beavers / Dalia Martinez6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrisha Walker / Emi McNair vs Nathalie Oropeza / Jennifer Talackine7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaula Decas / Rhonda Stacy vs Melinda Gonzales / Karen Truesdell6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Jill Rogers Fitch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Paula Decas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Nancy Almaraz
published
3.89
Trisha Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Kristin Ortiz
published
3.78
Emi McNair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Pingui Tavera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Jane Spears
published
3.41
Miranda Richard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Rhonda Stacy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Ortiz + Paula Decas3256% games+3.3% vs expected
Jill Rogers Fitch + Paula Decas314 matchesnot enough data
Emi McNair + Rhonda Stacy224 matchesnot enough data
Paula Decas + Trisha Walker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Rogers Fitch
48W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
Paula Decas
35W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Nancy Almaraz
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Trisha Walker
57W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Kristin Ortiz
38W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
3.5
Emi McNair
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Pingui Tavera
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Jane Spears
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Miranda Richard
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
Rhonda Stacy
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.