Teams

AArtzt/KWainscott (OPRC)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-06vs KEvans (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristina McWilliams / Krista Wainscott vs Kristine Evans / Mary Kay Deering6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKim Walsh / Jenny Havens vs Deborah Toomey / Anne Sauls0-6, 2-6
2022-04-15vs JBeal/CWitten (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina McWilliams / Krista Wainscott vs Robin Medlock / Nancy Pridnia2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Artzt / Jenny Havens vs Kimbrel Morris / Rosie Rogers5-7, 3-6
2022-04-08vs TWilliams (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Artzt / Krista Wainscott vs Sally Davidson / Suzy Sandbo3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJenny Havens vs Hunter Pawlush6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-25vs RHoppe (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Kennedy / Marie Shuford vs Robyn Hoppe / Paris Loesch3-6, 3-6
2022-03-04vs LCraig/KMcGregor (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Jennifer Margulis vs Kelly Levitas / India Branker7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJenny Havens vs Noelle Nali1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-25vs CCoover/TSanz (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina McWilliams / Krista Wainscott vs Karen Brooks / Katherine Fulcomer2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-02-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesJenny Havens / Sara Miller vs Lisa Gaylord / Jen Conway7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
3.91
Jenny Havens
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Krista Wainscott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
3.50
Jenny Duncan
published
3.35
Kim Walsh
published
3.21
Deana Deep
published 3.5
3.17
Chris Kennedy
published 3.5
3.08
Marie Shuford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carrie Bode
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Margulis + Kim Walsh4267% games+10.4% vs expected
Christina McWilliams + Krista Wainscott10559% games+8.6% vs expected
Marie Shuford + Chris Kennedy2540% games+0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Margulis + Krista Wainscott5254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina McWilliams
46W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jenny Havens
78W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Krista Wainscott
190W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jennifer Margulis
79W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Jenny Duncan
28W–12L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kim Walsh
22W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Deana Deep
11W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Chris Kennedy
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Marie Shuford
70W–90L career · 1 line in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Carrie Bode
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.