Teams

ILAU

Fall Flex Singles · 3.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Berman7171451
2ILAU6262665
3EM Tennis4343651
4Margaret Jacobsen3131237
5Hahn Solo3131438
6Fall Flex 2023 - Swanson35351170
7Ella Mills2121223
8Bridget Raach1212430
9Erin Starkey000000
10Kelly Fall Flex000000
11Seo000000
12Flex singles0404843
13Julie Poetsch05051060
14Lamb07071484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Anca Ilau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anca Ilau
82W–59L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.