Teams

Tennis Addicts

2026 Mixed 40 and Over League · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.96 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-29vs Nuts N HoneysWon 30
W#1 DoublesShara Wolfe / Nobuo Kitayama vs Kandy Grantz / Harold Fernandez7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAiko da Silva / Benjamin Falit vs Gage Beerer / Jerry Delacruz6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRuby Matsui / Lee Wolfe vs Justin Locke / Lori Tanaka4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-08vs Nuts N HoneysSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAiko da Silva / Matson Kelley vs Aron McEvoy / Gage Beerer6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Benjamin Falit vs Justin Locke / shar martin7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-02vs Nuts N HoneysWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Brad Helman vs Gage Beerer / Phillip Peterson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRuby Matsui / Matson Kelley vs Nalani Cagasan / Kirk Tanaka7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Kanahele / Nobuo Kitayama vs Lori Tanaka / Justin Locke6-4, 7-6
2026-07-25vs Nuts N HoneysWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Brad Helman vs Gage Beerer / Harold Fernandez6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAiko da Silva / Benjamin Falit vs Nalani Cagasan / Jerry Delacruz7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRuby Matsui / Henry Kofron vs shar martin / Justin Locke6-2, 6-3
2026-07-12vs Nuts N HoneysWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Helman / Petra Dupont vs Phillip Peterson / Marisa Fujimoto6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLee Wolfe / Ruby Matsui vs Daniel Medina / Gwen Yoshimoto6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHenry Kofron / Aiko da Silva vs Jerry Delacruz / Lori Tanaka6-4, 6-1
2026-07-11vs Nuts N HoneysWon 30
W#1 DoublesAiko da Silva / Matson Kelley vs Lori Tanaka / Kirk Tanaka6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Kanahele / Lee Wolfe vs Kandy Grantz / Jerry Delacruz7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesShara Wolfe / Nobuo Kitayama vs Marisa Fujimoto / Harold Fernandez7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Ruby Matsui
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.04
Petra Dupont
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Matson Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Brad Helman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Aiko da Silva
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.90
Deanna DiBiase
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
Jill Kanahele
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.88
Nobuo Kitayama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Benjamin Falit
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Henry Kofron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Lee Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Shara Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kanahele + Brad Helman5071% games+9.0% vs expected
Lee Wolfe + Shara Wolfe13855% games+7.0% vs expected
Deanna DiBiase + Brad Helman10362% games+6.5% vs expected
Matson Kelley + Aiko da Silva11165% games+3.0% vs expected
Henry Kofron + Aiko da Silva3352% games−8.3% vs expected
Benjamin Falit + Aiko da Silva224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruby Matsui
55W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.04
4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Matson Kelley
81W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Brad Helman
66W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Aiko da Silva
118W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Deanna DiBiase
144W–107L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Nobuo Kitayama
12W–2L career · type S · 10 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Benjamin Falit
93W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Henry Kofron
55W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Lee Wolfe
83W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Shara Wolfe
128W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.