Teams

9-MHansen/JWaters/RHodges-HVCC

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-04vs 3-Jogle-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Eberdt / Marie Hansen vs Laura Riedel / Jennifer Ogle0-6, 0-6
2023-04-27vs 7-JHagerty40-HVFYMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Beth Sholtz vs Christine Chnupa / Mary Parker2-6, 4-6
2023-04-20vs 5-ATandradinata-GRWon 20
W#2 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Thekla Pappas vs Ann Gray / Amy Barclay1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Hansen / Elisabeth Wiener vs Aulia Tandradinata / Kelly Polizzi6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-06vs 4-ATiemann-UNCLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Linsey Hughes vs Amy Tiemann / Sophie Brock4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCecily Peterson / Nancy Pike vs Vivian Muzyk / Marti Jenkins3-6, 4-6
2023-03-30vs 1-ECurry-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarie Hansen / Peggy Harris vs Dina Golden / Alvina Long6-0, 6-1
2023-03-23vs 2-EReiter-HRWon 21
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Jaime Parker6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarie Hansen / Nancy Pike vs Brynn Hale / Rose Corey5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Linsey Hughes vs Deborah Garbee / Kateri Hoekstra3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-16vs 8-MPanek-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Gayathri Rajaraman4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Linsey Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Alana Argersinger
published 3.5
3.20
Marie Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Nancy Pike
published
3.08
Elisabeth Wiener
published
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.03
Thekla Pappas
published
Beth Sholtz
published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
published
Jane Waters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Hansen + Nancy Pike213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linsey Hughes
87W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Alana Argersinger
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Marie Hansen
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Nancy Pike
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Elisabeth Wiener
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Thekla Pappas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Beth Sholtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Jane Waters
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.