Teams

Mouser/Givens/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-18vs Lahey/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesJanelle VanHootegem / Mary Mouser vs Leena Choi / Ann Frantz5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrandy Kennedy vs Stefani Sandow4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Catherine Pietsch vs Thalia Kahl / LIsa Robinson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Protz / Ashley West vs Rebecca Sara Cook / Kelly Bennie1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesEllen Gooden / Melissa Goldberg vs Kristi Broome / Marcia Harris6-0, 6-2
2026-04-11vs Nau/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesMary Mouser / Kelly Clapp vs Lauren Pollard / Marjorie George2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Hill vs Erin Neal2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshley West / Brittany Drescher vs Sarah Angus / Elizabeth Coburn6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMelissa Goldberg / Stephanie Protz vs Eileen Smith / Joy Cox2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesBrandy Kennedy / Patricia Frawley vs Carey Burch / Maggie Stockton6-3, 6-1
2026-03-28vs Lahey/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesEllen Gooden / Catherine Pietsch vs Meredith Amyx / Thalia Kahl4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJolene Chen vs Stefani Sandow6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Clapp / Patricia Frawley vs Sunyoung Fitt / Kelly Bennie6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Protz / Janelle VanHootegem vs Rebecca Sara Cook / Marina Messier7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Nau/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesBrittany Drescher / Ashley West vs JULIE GONTAREK / Eileen Smith6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJolene Chen vs Erin Neal5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Pietsch / Patricia Frawley vs Joy Cox / Lauren Pollard6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hill / Mary Mouser vs Carey Burch / Kate Stout6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesMichelle Deng / Janelle VanHootegem vs Elizabeth Coburn / Kelli Haywood7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Catherine Pietsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Ellen Gooden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Brittany Drescher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Pia Immordino
published
3.35
Mary Mouser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Kelly Clapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Jolene Chen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.29
Brandy Kennedy
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Melissa Goldberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Patricia Frawley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Stephanie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Janelle VanHootegem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Anne Jetton
published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Deng
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Sherri Givens
published
2.99
Stephanie Protz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Protz + Stephanie Hill5059% games+11.4% vs expected
Catherine Pietsch + Ellen Gooden16162% games+8.9% vs expected
Brandy Kennedy + Patricia Frawley6166% games+8.3% vs expected
Catherine Pietsch + Patricia Frawley6162% games+7.3% vs expected
Stephanie Protz + Sherri Givens5171% games+7.1% vs expected
Kelly Clapp + Mary Mouser4161% games+1.4% vs expected
Kelly Clapp + Catherine Pietsch6158% games−0.2% vs expected
Anne Jetton + Janelle VanHootegem2345% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Pietsch
47W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Ellen Gooden
52W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Brittany Drescher
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Pia Immordino
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
Mary Mouser
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kelly Clapp
42W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jolene Chen
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Brandy Kennedy
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Melissa Goldberg
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Patricia Frawley
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Stephanie Hill
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Janelle VanHootegem
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Anne Jetton
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michelle Deng
15W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sherri Givens
21W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
Stephanie Protz
39W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.