Teams

LA - Mountain Gators

2024 SoCal Doubles WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rebecca Mall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Jennifer Toplitzky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
Casondra Ruga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Sharon Monempour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Karen Haltrecht
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Antonieta Monaldi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Casey Weitzman
published 4
3.64
Karen Bruckner
published
3.58
Michelle Farhadi
published
3.56
Betty Shalom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Nicola Kerner
published
3.51
Jacki Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Katy Burgess
published 3.5
3.37
Alice Wilson
published 3.5
3.31
Yolanda Zackler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Tracy Levine
published
Shelley Leboff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Monempour + Katy Burgess13758% games+4.3% vs expected
Rebecca Mall + Jennifer Toplitzky741664% games−0.7% vs expected
Jacki Shepherd + Karen Bruckner6448% games−0.7% vs expected
Antonieta Monaldi + Karen Haltrecht212451% games−1.0% vs expected
Jacki Shepherd + Karen Haltrecht4645% games−11.8% vs expected
Betty Shalom + Casondra Ruga9361% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rebecca Mall
143W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Jennifer Toplitzky
129W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Casondra Ruga
166W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Sharon Monempour
85W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Karen Haltrecht
49W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Antonieta Monaldi
38W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Casey Weitzman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Karen Bruckner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Michelle Farhadi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Betty Shalom
121W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Nicola Kerner
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Jacki Shepherd
30W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Katy Burgess
132W–61L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Alice Wilson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Yolanda Zackler
65W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
Tracy Levine
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Shelley Leboff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.