Teams

Elcock

2025 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-02vs ToroWon 10
W#2 SinglesQuentin Cummings vs Tom Erdely6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-29vs ToroWon 10
W#2 SinglesQuentin Cummings vs Charles Mandeville6-4, 7-5
2025-10-01vs ToroWon 21
L#1 SinglesTim Cogar vs Greg Singh3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Pim vs Alejandro Carrera4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTyler Caccamo vs Jose Toro7-6, 7-6
2025-09-27vs ToroLost 01
L#2 SinglesQuentin Cummings vs Charles Mandeville7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-13vs ToroWon 21
W#1 SinglesPatrick Bernhard vs Tom Erdely6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDamien Morris vs Greg Singh2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTim Cogar vs Jose Toro6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Patrick Bernhard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Quentin Cummings
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.03
Tim Cogar
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Trevon Jensen
published
2.74
Chris Elcock
published 3
2.66
David Pim
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Damien Morris
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Stan Williams
published
Tyler Caccamo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Bernhard
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Quentin Cummings
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Tim Cogar
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Trevon Jensen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chris Elcock
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
David Pim
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Damien Morris
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Stan Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Caccamo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.