Teams

2 ACAC Hall

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-05vs 3 Richmond Tennisbums 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Sherman / Eric Nelson vs Timothy Gitomirski / Moshea Aleem6-4, 6-4
2022-05-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesDuke Crane / Stuart Fulcher vs Eric Cofer / Douglas Erickson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs 4 Woodlake Patterson 4.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Richard Sherman vs Eric Estes / Ken Patterson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-15vs 7 RidgeTop LefkowitzLost 01
L#3 DoublesBradley Snyder / Richard Sherman vs David Rathke / Sean Reynolds6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-08vs 5 Westwood Godsey 4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesBen Hall / Richard Sherman vs Richard Godsey / Anthony Palesis6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesStuart Fulcher vs Zachary King1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNathan Arland / Eric Nelson vs Ian Webster / Michael Kord6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Arland / Eric Nelson vs Anthony Fiorenza / Eric Spivack7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEric Nelson / Nathan Arland vs John Bennett / Chuck Snow3-6, 3-6
2022-04-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Richard Sherman vs Luis Rodriguez-Miranda / Douglas Erickson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-10vs 4 Woodlake Patterson 4.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesScott Kim / Stuart Fulcher vs Renato Mendoza / Wieslaw Gumulak3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Bradley Snyder
published 4.5
4.14
Stuart Fulcher
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Scott Kim
published
3.98
Nathan Arland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
David Voth
published 4
3.83
Richard Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bradley Snyder
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Scott Kim
4W–20L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Nathan Arland
82W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
David Voth
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Richard Sherman
173W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.