Teams

Newell 6.5 Mixed Combo

2023 Frederick Combo Mixed · Frederick Combo Mixed 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-19vs Thongphok 6.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Hong / David Grimaldi vs Kristin Ostlie / James Smith2-6, 6-7
2023-04-17vs Martin 6.5 Mixed ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Jason LaRose vs Kimberly Price / Craig Gordon6-2, 6-1
2023-04-10vs Thongphok 6.5 Mixed ComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Newell / David Grimaldi vs Janann Mercker / Raman Batish2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Jason LaRose vs Shelby Price / Michael Giganti6-0, 6-1
2023-04-06vs Martin 6.5 Mixed ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Arnold Smith / Dang Hoang vs Kathleen Maiden / Enrrique Sanchez6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Ashish Deshmukh vs Richard McKeon / STACEY WOLFE6-2, 6-4
2023-03-30vs Thongphok 6.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Rodriguez / David Grimaldi vs Carrie Derse / Grant McWilliams4-6, 1-6
2023-03-19vs Thongphok 6.5 Mixed ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Arnold Smith / David Grimaldi vs Nikki Eyman / Wayne Wang7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Jason LaRose vs Angela Sharma / Bill Hartman1-6, 4-6
2023-03-19vs Martin 6.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Jason LaRose vs Joseph Jacangelo / STACEY WOLFE6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Derek Johnson
published 3.5
3.30
Kimberly LaRose
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Peter Hong
published
3.04
Emily Rodriguez
published 3
3.02
Richard Brandt
published
2.85
Hannah Arnold Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jeanne Dolan
published
2.78
David Grimaldi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Ellen Hong
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Hong + Peter Hong2644% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Derek Johnson
59W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.73
3.5
Kimberly LaRose
147W–119L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Peter Hong
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Emily Rodriguez
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Richard Brandt
20W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Hannah Arnold Smith
47W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jeanne Dolan
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
David Grimaldi
24W–24L career · type M · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ellen Hong
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.