Teams

Curtis, Brian

2024 Adult Mixed 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-20vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaki True / Dan Pichler vs Delane Cohen / Jeffrey Asbell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Hooper / Scott Hooper vs Tasha Evatt / John Evatt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Erickson / Jacob Cherian vs Mike Holm / Candace Asbell2-6, 6-7
2024-08-23vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Coleman / Ann Curtis vs Jeffrey Asbell / Delane Cohen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Curtis / Theresa Danforth Costello vs John Evatt / Tasha Evatt4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Hooper / Anne Hooper vs Mike Holm / Candace Asbell2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXD5112614145
2Craig, John3310817148
3Schmitz, Neil2471124172
4Curtis, Brian2471126185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Marc Morris
published
3.35
Ann Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Maki True
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Lori Blinn
published
3.25
Anne Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Coleman
published 3.5
3.05
Dan Pichler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Theresa Danforth Costello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kent Erickson
published
2.94
Sonya Muller
published
Jacob Cherian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Kanan
published
Lisa Erickson
published
Scott Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kent Erickson + Sonya Muller3749% gamesnot enough data
Anne Hooper + Scott Hooper3542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marc Morris
38W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Ann Curtis
33W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Maki True
113W–101L career · 1 line in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
Lori Blinn
140W–176L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Anne Hooper
53W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David Coleman
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dan Pichler
34W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Theresa Danforth Costello
77W–101L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kent Erickson
16W–39L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Sonya Muller
70W–83L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jacob Cherian
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
James Kanan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Erickson
23W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Hooper
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.