Teams

BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian

2023 ADULT 55 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-06vs BC-WestEnd/CherlyUnreinLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Morris / Kay Cotter vs Susan Neal / Mary Kay Dyes1-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs BC-LLW-PVTC/ElizabethLujambioLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Perry / Leslie Winston vs Stephanie Guggenheim / LENI GERASS1-6, 1-6
2023-07-09vs BC-LLW-PVTC/ElizabethLujambioWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeslie Winston / Mina Jorgensen vs Tanya Drawer / Pamela Tansavatdi6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-03vs BC-LLW-PVTC/ElizabethLujambioLost 01
L#3 DoublesTara Aviel / Leslie Winston vs Siobhan van Gieson / Tanya Drawer2-6, 3-6
2023-05-21vs BC-AltaVista/YolandaSmithLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanette Peter / Leslie Winston vs Gloria Cardoza / Deborah Ford7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Angela Landoch
published 3.5
3.22
Milagros Holub
published
3.14
Tara Aviel
published
3.11
Karen Barry
published
2.95
Jady Vonderlieth
published
2.94
Leslie Winston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.73
Kay Cotter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Evelyn Gossett
published
Dolly Pham
published
Linda Layton
published
Mina Jorgensen
published
Sandra Nervig
published
Sherry Davidowitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Cotter + Leslie Winston5546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Landoch
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
Milagros Holub
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Tara Aviel
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Karen Barry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jady Vonderlieth
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3.5
Leslie Winston
47W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Kay Cotter
155W–94L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Evelyn Gossett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Dolly Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Layton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mina Jorgensen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Nervig
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Davidowitz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.