Teams

Greenway

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-08vs CVTA/Lori PatchWon 41
W#1 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Catrina Mashburn vs Dana Kubow / Kay Henderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristy Slocum vs Amy Harrington6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Millican / Rachel Ragland vs Christina Ellis / Shauna Kelly4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Drummond / Angela Evans vs Lori Patch / Stephonie Walker6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesLibby Lanier / Lisa Wheat vs Amy Hodges / Pam Chapman7-6, 6-3
2026-05-05vs CVTA/Lori PatchLost 14
W#1 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Catrina Mashburn vs Ann Carroll / Pam Chapman6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristy Slocum vs Carol Martinez4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJan Wilson / Regina Drummond vs Lisa McCanless / Kay Henderson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Mobbs / Rachel Ragland vs Meredith Banta / Amy Mitchell1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesSandra Copeland / Lisa Wheat vs Lelia MacKey / Dana Kubow1-6, 5-7
2026-04-25vs CargleLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Karlene Welty vs Millie Morgan / Cami Marcus4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Slocum vs Cindy Rivers McGraw6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Evans / Emily Mobbs vs Carissa Richardson / Ronna Sabino1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Millican / Lisa Wheat vs Kit Stockton / Joanna Fife4-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesRegina Drummond / Rachel Ragland vs Birdie Reed / Constance Fallin0-6, 2-6
2026-04-21vs CargleLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Evans / Christy Slocum vs Millie Morgan / Cami Marcus0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Ragland / Emily Mobbs vs Caleigh Schroeder / Kate Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJan Wilson / Lisa Wheat vs Joanna Fife / Kit Stockton1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#4 DoublesSandra Copeland / Dana Strickland vs Carissa Richardson / Constance Fallin1-6, 0-6
2026-04-14vs CVTA/Lori PatchLost 14
L#1 DoublesPam Mills / Catrina Mashburn vs Ann Carroll / Carol Martinez3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Slocum vs Amy Hodges6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRegina Drummond / Angela Evans vs Dana Kubow / Christina Ellis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Millican / Dana Strickland vs Amy Mitchell / Amy Harrington3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesLibby Lanier / Rachel Ragland vs Meredith Banta / Lori Patch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-31vs CargleLost 04
L#1 DoublesCatrina Mashburn / Pam Mills vs Denise Smith / Kerrigan LeBoeuf3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Greenway vs Ronna Sabino1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Strickland / Sandra Copeland vs Millie Morgan / Sarah Cargle1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Wheat / Jan Wilson vs Cami Marcus / Jean Sheffield6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CVTA/Lori Patch24141636283
2Greenway1572348326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Karlene Welty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Catrina Mashburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Brooke Greenway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Martha Millican
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Pam Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Angela Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Lisa Wheat
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Regina Drummond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Emily Mobbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.52
Christy Slocum
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.48
Jan Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Libby Lanier
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Rachel Ragland
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.17
Sandra Copeland
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Dana Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Wheat + Jan Wilson2936% games−7.9% vs expected
Dana Strickland + Rachel Ragland134 matchesnot enough data
Catrina Mashburn + Pam Mills134 matchesnot enough data
Angela Evans + Jan Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Strickland + Sandra Copeland123 matchesnot enough data
Regina Drummond + Sandra Copeland033 matchesnot enough data
Catrina Mashburn + Brooke Greenway213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karlene Welty
22W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Catrina Mashburn
41W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Brooke Greenway
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Martha Millican
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Pam Mills
53W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Angela Evans
20W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Lisa Wheat
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Regina Drummond
7W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Emily Mobbs
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
2.5
Christy Slocum
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Jan Wilson
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Libby Lanier
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45
Rachel Ragland
10W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
Sandra Copeland
9W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Dana Strickland
4W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.