Teams

Mirabay Rockets - P. Franco

2025 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over Men · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesSebastian Graba / Joseph Plata vs James McAuley / Tyrese Cohen1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesManav Rattan / Nick Sexton vs NICHOLAS INNISS / Jason Lee5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJoseph Plata / Luke Zoetmulder vs Matthew Hayes / Ken Patrick4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Marchman / Nick Sexton vs Kenneth Sallings / Todd Abrams4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJim Gitney / Nick Aganin vs Jason Lichtman / Sean O'Brien3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesEA Gray / Nicholas Rothstein vs James McAuley / Tyrese Cohen2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesManav Rattan / Richard Marchman vs Justin Li / Keval Patel3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Plata / Nick Aganin vs Gregory Hovsepian / Jason Lee1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Pedro Franco Byrne
published
3.90
Sebastian Graba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Nicholas Rothstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Mohamed Aboul-Ezz
published
3.69
Manav Rattan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Luke Zoetmulder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Nick Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
EA Gray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Billy Pomykalski
published 3.5
Jim Gitney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Plata
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Aganin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Marchman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manav Rattan + Mohamed Aboul-Ezz213 matchesnot enough data
EA Gray + Nick Sexton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pedro Franco Byrne
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
4.35
Sebastian Graba
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Nicholas Rothstein
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Mohamed Aboul-Ezz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Manav Rattan
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Luke Zoetmulder
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Nick Sexton
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
EA Gray
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Billy Pomykalski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Gitney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Plata
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Aganin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Marchman
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.