Teams

SSH ORANGE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-02vs HV BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Renard vs Wendy Stookesberry6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Vatter / Charla Beram vs Kellina Flansburg / Jessica Losier6-0, 6-0
2021-05-26vs HG NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharla Beram / Jennifer Mell vs Heidi Custer / Sara Katt6-2, 6-1
2021-05-19vs HW REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Renard / Rhea McMahon vs Carina Clancy / Haley Evans6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Vatter / Katherine Barnes vs Blythe Leinwand / Kathryn Briggs6-3, 6-1
2021-05-12vs HW PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Fry / Jennifer Renard vs Cynthia McLean / Debora Rewerts6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Vatter / Andrea Caldwell vs Allison DiPaolo / Megan Nygren6-0, 6-0
2021-05-05vs VCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhea McMahon / Jennifer Renard vs Stephanie Geller / Lindsey Bye6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-26vs WC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Caldwell / Emily Vatter vs Kathryn Cullen / Brigit McNair5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Rhea McMahon
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Fry
published
2.83
Katherine Barnes
published
2.64
Charla Beram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer Renard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.52
Emily Vatter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Andrea Caldwell
published 2.5
2.22
Jennifer Mell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Fry + Jennifer Renard5168% games+9.2% vs expected
Stephanie Fry + Rhea McMahon13359% games+7.5% vs expected
Katherine Barnes + Rhea McMahon9262% games+7.0% vs expected
Jennifer Mell + Andrea Caldwell161256% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Renard + Katherine Barnes7547% games+3.3% vs expected
Stephanie Fry + Katherine Barnes4652% games+0.0% vs expected
Emily Vatter + Jennifer Renard9650% games−1.3% vs expected
Emily Vatter + Charla Beram8949% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rhea McMahon
135W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%40%60%
3.53
Stephanie Fry
90W–44L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Katherine Barnes
74W–52L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Charla Beram
92W–76L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Jennifer Renard
130W–132L career · 4 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Emily Vatter
65W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Andrea Caldwell
54W–34L career · no lines in 2021
0%97%3%
2.26
Jennifer Mell
37W–28L career · no lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.