Teams

Venable/MH

2024 Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women - Local League at State

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-03vs Wenzler/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Linda Pearce / Marsha Guffey7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTheia Foley / Carolyn Kelley vs Janie Calvert / Dena Wenzler6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Bennett / Linda Robertson vs Jolene Coop / Anne Hawkins6-0, 6-3
2024-11-02vs Dehaven/Glover/LR/Won 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Kathy Mascuilli / Rina Thomas6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTheia Foley / Toni Fisher vs Diane Boland / Karen Bryant7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Robertson / Mary Bennett vs Cindy Hollowell / Linda Cassinelli6-4, 6-2
2024-11-02vs Wenzler/NLR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Robertson / Carolyn Kelley vs Linda Pearce / Marsha Guffey6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Anne Hawkins / Christine Summage-West6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTheia Foley / Mary Bennett vs Dena Wenzler / Janie Calvert4-6, 3-6
2024-11-01vs Dehaven/Glover/LR/Won 21
L#1 DoublesToni Fisher / Carolyn Kelley vs Kathy Mascuilli / Susan Coleman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Decker / Phyllis Venable vs Lou Stevens / Rina Thomas6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMary Bennett / Linda Robertson vs Robin Dehaven / Jann Pharo7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Local League at State have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Toni Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Linda Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Nancy Decker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Phyllis Venable
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Mary Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Carolyn Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Theia Foley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Decker + Phyllis Venable15955% games+4.4% vs expected
Nancy Decker + Linda Robertson2642% games−8.3% vs expected
Mary Bennett + Linda Robertson6353% games−11.5% vs expected
Theia Foley + Carolyn Kelley224 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Kelley + Linda Robertson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Toni Fisher
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Linda Robertson
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Nancy Decker
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Phyllis Venable
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Mary Bennett
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Carolyn Kelley
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Theia Foley
20W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.