Teams

BC-Westend/DianeWoyonsky

2021 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-08vs BC-Kramer/DonnaAshcraftLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Riley / Cindy Monticue vs Christine Ball / Pamela Tansavatdi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-08-01vs BC-LLW-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Wong / Sharon Levine vs Aileen Kizlinski / Denise Matsumoto6-0, 6-4
2021-07-11vs BC-MCC/LeasaIrelandWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Riley / Diana Katnic vs Christine Mancini / Corina McGovern7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-20vs BC-PVTC/JanetYoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Wong / Shubha Chick vs Rebecca Sommerstein / Erin Aslay6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Kim Graham
published
3.65
Shubha Chick
published
3.54
Kelly Wong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Kim Silvera
published
3.26
Cindy Monticue
published 3.5
Edwina Klein
published 3.5
3.10
Joyce Choi
published
3.03
Theresa Riley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Susana Jalali
published
2.96
Joyce Flood
published
Diana Katnic
published
Karen Chan
published
Sharon Levine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susana Jalali + Theresa Riley3541% games−9.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Graham
20W–9L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
Shubha Chick
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kelly Wong
72W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kim Silvera
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cindy Monticue
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Edwina Klein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joyce Choi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Theresa Riley
64W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Susana Jalali
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.02
Joyce Flood
3W–13L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Diana Katnic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Chan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Levine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.