Teams

LOCH.Baldwin

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-06vs CAS.ValeroWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Baldwin / Jeff Cockayne vs Morten Pedersen / Christian Jacobsen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Heaphy / Everett Laborde vs James Klemenz / Mark Holland6-0, 6-2
2024-09-29vs TOC.YadavWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Heaphy / Jeff Cockayne vs Scott McElreath / Amit Sachan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs TOC.VeerappanWon 10
W#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Mark Baldwin vs Manikandan Subramanian / Seshagiri Kalluru6-3, 6-4
2024-09-15vs ANP.SahaLost 01
L#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / John Nealis vs Malla Reddy Anumandla / Rajshekar Chandraprakash6-7, 2-4
2024-08-18vs TOC.RaghavanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Reynolds / Everett Laborde vs Karan Mehra / Rahul Narang3-6, 1-6
2024-08-11vs CAS.ValeroWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Cockayne / John Nealis vs Jeffrey Tabelon / Hugh Cole6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEverett Laborde / Kyle Reynolds vs Morten Pedersen / Luivi Valero4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jeff Cockayne
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.78
Mark Baldwin
published
3.77
Everett Laborde
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.67
John Nealis
published
3.59
Jeff Estroff
published
3.53
Len White
published
3.48
Pedro Torrejon
published
3.28
Brian Heaphy
published 3.5
3.20
Todd Bachman
published
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Everett Laborde + Jeff Cockayne5362% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Cockayne
155W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Everett Laborde
89W–62L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
John Nealis
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Jeff Estroff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Len White
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Pedro Torrejon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Brian Heaphy
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Todd Bachman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.