← Teams

2-Post-Rust-DFC

2023 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Button Hall6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Sarah Baldwin6-0, 6-0
2023-07-11vs 1-KPollak-Eno-40Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Kathryn Pollak6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Nichole Hatcher6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-26Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Reena Patel Bland6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Sarah Baldwin6-4, 6-1
2023-06-21vs 1-KPollak-Eno-40Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesSusana Harvey vs Sarah Baldwin6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Kathryn Pollak7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Button Hall6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-14vs 1-KPollak-Eno-40Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Xylena Simone Sziksai6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSusana Harvey vs Nichole Hatcher6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Kathryn Pollak6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-05Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Reena Patel Bland6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Button Hall7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-31vs 1-KPollak-Eno-40Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Xylena Simone Sziksai6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Nichole Hatcher6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Button Hall1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Chanel Chambers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.94
Dayna Kelly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.71
Amanda Lacoff
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Christa McGill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8–358% games+3.9% vs expected
Susie Post-Rust + Susana Harvey1–445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.94
3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Amanda Lacoff
191W–114L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Christa McGill
119W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.