Teams

UPTA40FF/Murillo/Cardinal

2026 UPTA Fall 39 & over-Women · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40A/Gunderson/Pavilion000000
2UPTA39FF/Hill/Hwy14000000
3UPTA39FF/Trexler/Kroc000000
4UPTA39FF/Wynn/Kroc000000
5UPTA39FF/Beeby/Kroc000000
6UPTA39FF/Farr/Pavilion000000
7UPTA39FF/Hendersom/Riverwalk000000
8UPTA39FF/Jackson/GCC000000
9UPTA40FF/Ellison/GCC000000
10UPTA39FF/Auger/Butler Springs000000
11UPTA39A/Thompson/Thornblade000000
12UPTA40FF/Murillo/Cardinal000000
13UPTA39FF/Walters/Holly Tree000000
14UPTA39FF/Daniel/Brookstone000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Carrie Drennon
published 3.5
3.38
Jackie Walker
published
3.27
Andrea Murillo
published 3.5
3.25
Tari Dygert
published
3.19
Mary Jo Clarkson
published
3.19
Denise Malone
published 3.5
3.12
Sandi Tolly
published
3.08
Britanny A ROOD
published 3.5
3.06
Lorri Laufenberg
published
3.02
Susan Krzeminski
published
3.02
Nancy Lanois
published
2.90
Katherine Robinson
published
2.81
Kyra Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Lanois + Kyra Roberts2350% games+4.3% vs expected
Britanny A ROOD + Andrea Murillo4749% games−1.0% vs expected
Denise Malone + Katherine Robinson101346% games−8.4% vs expected
Nancy Lanois + Susan Krzeminski224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Lanois + Katherine Robinson044 matchesnot enough data
Kyra Roberts + Andrea Murillo314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Krzeminski + Britanny A ROOD224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Krzeminski + Andrea Murillo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Drennon
20W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jackie Walker
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Andrea Murillo
39W–37L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Tari Dygert
43W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Mary Jo Clarkson
32W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Denise Malone
16W–24L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Sandi Tolly
17W–11L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Britanny A ROOD
21W–32L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lorri Laufenberg
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Susan Krzeminski
36W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Nancy Lanois
12W–24L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Katherine Robinson
17W–26L career · no lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kyra Roberts
17W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.