Teams

40 & Over Refund

2026 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Refunds

15 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · Refunds
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
118 & Over Refund000000
240 & Over Refund000000
355 & Over Refund000000
465 & Over Refund000000
518s No refund000000
640s No refund000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Dana Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Liz Barton
published
3.86
Cynthia Delay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Kirsten Morin
published
3.47
Sheila O'donnell
published
3.28
Sherry Lerme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Sheela Bryan
published
2.91
Carla Kroh
published 3
2.55
Christina Elrod
published 3
2.49
Lesa Conroy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.46
Cindy Orr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Jenny Grantham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Cheryl Parrish
published 2.5
Ted Gibson
published
Trish Kowalchyk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesa Conroy + Jenny Grantham224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Goodrich
89W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Liz Barton
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Cynthia Delay
129W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Kirsten Morin
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Sheila O'donnell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sheela Bryan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Carla Kroh
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Christina Elrod
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
2.5
Lesa Conroy
34W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Cindy Orr
103W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Jenny Grantham
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Cheryl Parrish
13W–29L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Ted Gibson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Trish Kowalchyk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.