Teams

TOC.Chaudhari

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-28vs TOC.SachanLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuke Hader / Luo Xiao vs Youngjun Lee / Chaitawat Sirisereewan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Fowler / Cameron Leggett vs Praveen Yadav / Nate Wireback1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDEEPAK GAONKAR / Ashutosh Chaudhari vs Amit Kumar / Shivam Panthri2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-22vs TOC.Byrd2Won 30
W#1 DoublesAshutosh Chaudhari / Ryan Sheppard vs Zachary Hopp / Conner Garrison6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMahesh Salian / DEEPAK GAONKAR vs Jonathan Carter / David Belcher6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMiles Feng / Cameron Leggett vs Louis Crow / Srivatsan Ramesh6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Gregson1021325
2TOC.Chaudhari000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Justin Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Miles Feng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Luke Hader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
DEEPAK GAONKAR
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Luo Xiao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Mahesh Salian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Cameron Leggett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Austin Gardner
published 3.5
3.26
Ashutosh Chaudhari
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
UTPAL JADIA
published 3.5
Nihar Vaidya
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mahesh Salian + Ashutosh Chaudhari3255% gamesnot enough data
UTPAL JADIA + Mahesh Salian224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Fowler
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Miles Feng
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Luke Hader
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
DEEPAK GAONKAR
49W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Luo Xiao
84W–98L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Mahesh Salian
66W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Cameron Leggett
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Austin Gardner
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Ashutosh Chaudhari
60W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
UTPAL JADIA
24W–34L career · type A · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Nihar Vaidya
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.