Teams

SDNC 4.0 La Costa Resort / Flaherty

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPete Zielinski / John Conlin vs Russell Silberstein / Joshua Gaylis3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Adelman / Joseph Pasquito vs Robert Brownhill / Stanton Greene7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDonald Carroll / Joseph Pasquito vs John Kampfhenkel / Jacob Isaac6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPete Zielinski / Jeffery Phillips vs Robert Bacon / Scot Tammen6-2, 6-2
2022-10-16vs SDNC 4.0 Valley Center/ ZengLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Pasquito / Donald Carroll vs Steve Kimble / Manny Ortuno6-7, 4-6
2022-10-09vs SDNC 4.0 Fallbrook TC/ UstarizWon 10
W#3 DoublesAgustin Lebron / Pete Zielinski vs Frank Rodriguez / Larry Shapiro6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPete Zielinski / Dean Stiger vs Troy Anderson / Myles Vencill2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Flaherty / Joseph Pasquito vs Patrick Coughlin / Christopher Berg6-4, 6-2
2022-09-25vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC/ YeemWon 10
W#3 DoublesPete Zielinski / Jon Murphy vs Bruce Bakely / Steve Leffler6-1, 6-3
2022-09-18vs SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run/ DennyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Lo / Pete Zielinski vs Jason Graves / Seth Mullen2-6, 1-6
2022-09-11vs SDNC 4.0 RB Community TC/ MoureyLost 01
L#3 DoublesPete Zielinski / Agustin Lebron vs Andrew Chiu / Glenn Sherman6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Greg Flaherty
published 4
3.72
Donald Carroll
published 4
3.71
Joseph Pasquito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Dean Stiger
published 4
3.52
Jim Grady
published
3.46
John Conlin
published
3.46
Sam Munitz
published
3.35
Jon Murphy
published
3.32
Pete Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Carroll + Joseph Pasquito2343% games−4.7% vs expected
Greg Flaherty + Sam Munitz134 matchesnot enough data
Sam Munitz + Jim Grady213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Flaherty
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Donald Carroll
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Joseph Pasquito
34W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Dean Stiger
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jim Grady
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
John Conlin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Sam Munitz
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Jon Murphy
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Pete Zielinski
38W–52L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.