Teams

Enk/18's/3.5/PAC Day

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-02-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesWitney Arch vs Chanell Charapata6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schof/18's/3.5/SC Day62261436319
2Graybill/18's/3.5/TCH Day53251536331
3Enk/18's/3.5/PAC Day53231740317
4Dodson/18's.3.5/BC Day44221841335
5Skarica/18's/3.5/SC Day0843674453

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Alecia Seastrunk
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Jessica Tufaro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.10
Crissy Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.04
Ana Perdigao
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
Jana Phillippi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kacey Zillner
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Lauren Ortis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Ricalde
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Merritt Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Regina Knight
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Ronda Walters
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Witney Arch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronda Walters + Shannon Enk9754% gamesnot enough data
Merritt Edwards + Shannon Enk6358% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Zillner + Mary Toce8066% gamesnot enough data
Ronda Walters + Mary Toce3450% gamesnot enough data
Regina Knight + Merritt Edwards1440% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Zillner + Shannon Enk2359% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Ricalde + Merritt Edwards314 matchesnot enough data
Merritt Edwards + Lauren Ortis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
17W–14L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jessica Tufaro
17W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Amber Mata
22W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Crissy Green
30W–11L career · 26 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Ana Perdigao
13W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Jana Phillippi
14W–11L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kacey Zillner
21W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Ortis
14W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Ricalde
14W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Toce
41W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Merritt Edwards
31W–21L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Knight
21W–23L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronda Walters
32W–18L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Enk
52W–32L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Witney Arch
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.