← Teams

KKnoblauch

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-26vs DRusnak 2.5SLost 0–1
L#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Natalie Norris4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-19Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-05vs DRusnak 2.5SWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Ashley Lindeman6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Brittany Shumaker7-6, 6-2
2022-09-28vs JMerta singlesWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Mary Zimardo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Abigail Douek7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Erica Oliver6-2, 6-2
2022-09-21vs SCookeWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Courtney Britt6-4, 6-3
2022-09-14vs DRusnak 2.5SWon 2–0
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Jade Paunovich5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKatherine Rostick vs Rondi Furgason7-5, 6-3
2022-08-31vs SCookeWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesKatherine Rostick vs Courtney Britt6-3, 6-4
2022-08-29vs DRusnak 2.5SWon 1–0
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Amy Cagle6-3, 6-1
2022-08-17Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Rostick vs Beth Russo6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNicole Masters vs Erica Oliver6-3, 6-0
2022-08-10vs SCookeWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Lauren Daigle6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKatherine Rostick vs Mollie Weimer6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Jessica Jones6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Kari Knoblauch
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.84
2.82
Emily Best
published 3
2.78
Katherine Rostick
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
Emily Boyer
published 3
2.57
Nicole Masters
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Masters + Kari Knoblauch2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kari Knoblauch
114W–69L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Courtney Grinnell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Emily Best
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Katherine Rostick
55W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Nicole Masters
45W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.