Teams

West Homewood - Harris

2024 B'ham Spring - 40 & Over Weeknight: 1S, 3D · 3.0 Men - Tuesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sherwood Silliman
published
3.34
Brandon Hasenfuss
published 3.5
3.21
Jeff Langford
published
3.00
Paul Vercher
published
2.92
David Reeves
published 3
2.91
Tim Clanton
published
2.88
Todd Sitton
published
2.88
Tony LaRussa
published
2.88
Clay Williams
published 3
2.88
Robert Clay
published
2.81
BRIAN Harris
published 3
2.54
Trevor Gillies
published
Jonathan LeDuc
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Reeves + Tim Clanton3256% games+5.7% vs expected
BRIAN Harris + Tim Clanton5450% games−1.6% vs expected
Tony LaRussa + Robert Clay2546% games−2.3% vs expected
BRIAN Harris + Robert Clay213 matchesnot enough data
BRIAN Harris + David Reeves213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherwood Silliman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Brandon Hasenfuss
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Jeff Langford
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Paul Vercher
23W–30L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
David Reeves
29W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Tim Clanton
28W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Todd Sitton
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Tony LaRussa
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Clay Williams
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Robert Clay
18W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
BRIAN Harris
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Trevor Gillies
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54
Jonathan LeDuc
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.